S846 Functional Lumen Imaging Probe Measurement Post-Pneumatic Dilation in Patients With Achalasia

Introduction: Pneumatic dilation (PD) is a well-established therapeutic option for achalasia. Functional lumen impedance planimetry (FLIP) offers real-time assessment of lower esophageal sphincter (LES) distensibility and diameter. This retrospective cohort study aimed to assess whether FLIP measurements changed with symptom improvement post-PD in patients with achalasia. A secondary aim was to evaluate whether post-PD FLIP measurements correlated with the need for repeat dilation. Methods: Patients with a confirmed diagnosis of achalasia based on manometry, timed barium esophagram (TBE), and FLIP who underwent PD were included. Pre- and post-dilation FLIP parameters, including distensibility index (DI) and diameter were recorded. Post-PD FLIP was performed during the same endoscopy session following PD. Clinical response was assessed with Eckardt scores pre-PD and post-PD. Patients were stratified based on the need for repeat PD during the follow-up period. Additional stratification was performed based on achalasia subtypes. Per guidelines for post-procedural follow-up, post-PD Eckardt scores were obtained at 6-8 week follow-up visits. Results: A total of 21 patients were included in the study. After PD, average DI increased from 1.5 mm²/mmHg to 4.3 mm²/mmHg (P < 0.001), and diameter improved from 9.04 mm to 15.9 mm (P < 0.001). Similar post-PD changes were observed among each achalasia subtype. The average post-PD Eckardt score was 1.78, which decreased from an average pre-PD score of 4.66. Among patients requiring repeat PD, average post-PD DI and diameter were 4.03 mm²/mmHg and 14.74 mm, respectively, which were not significantly different compared to those who did not require repeat dilation (P = 0.45, 0.14, respectively). Average Eckardt scores at 6-8 weeks were not statistically different from patients who did not require repeat dilation (P = 0.278). Conclusion: In patients with achalasia, PD is associated with improved DI and diameter as measured by FLIP, which is consistent with symptomatic improvement shown by Eckardt score. However, post-PD FLIP parameters did not identify a correlation with the need for subsequent dilation. Further investigation is warranted to establish FLIP-based thresholds that may guide treatment and follow-up planning.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001130844.25976.71
Primary Topic
Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S846 Functional Lumen Imaging Probe Measurement Post-Pneumatic Dilation in Patients With Achalasia

Elizabeth Armstrong, Steven Clayton, R. Morris Treadway, James Miller et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
article

S846 Functional Lumen Imaging Probe Measurement Post-Pneumatic Dilation in Patients With Achalasia

Elizabeth Armstrong, Steven Clayton, R. Morris Treadway, James Miller, Zachary Mitchell
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Pneumatic dilation (PD) is a well-established therapeutic option for achalasia. Functional lumen impedance planimetry (FLIP) offers real-time assessment of lower esophageal sphincter (LES) distensibility and diameter. This retrospective cohort study aimed to assess whether FLIP measurements changed with symptom improvement post-PD in patients with achalasia. A secondary aim was to evaluate whether post-PD FLIP measurements correlated with the need for repeat dilation. Methods: Patients with a confirmed diagnosis of achalasia based on manometry, timed barium esophagram (TBE), and FLIP who underwent PD were included. Pre- and post-dilation FLIP parameters, including distensibility index (DI) and diameter were recorded. Post-PD FLIP was performed during the same endoscopy session following PD. Clinical response was assessed with Eckardt scores pre-PD and post-PD. Patients were stratified based on the need for repeat PD during the follow-up period. Additional stratification was performed based on achalasia subtypes. Per guidelines for post-procedural follow-up, post-PD Eckardt scores were obtained at 6-8 week follow-up visits. Results: A total of 21 patients were included in the study. After PD, average DI increased from 1.5 mm²/mmHg to 4.3 mm²/mmHg (P < 0.001), and diameter improved from 9.04 mm to 15.9 mm (P < 0.001). Similar post-PD changes were observed among each achalasia subtype. The average post-PD Eckardt score was 1.78, which decreased from an average pre-PD score of 4.66. Among patients requiring repeat PD, average post-PD DI and diameter were 4.03 mm²/mmHg and 14.74 mm, respectively, which were not significantly different compared to those who did not require repeat dilation (P = 0.45, 0.14, respectively). Average Eckardt scores at 6-8 weeks were not statistically different from patients who did not require repeat dilation (P = 0.278). Conclusion: In patients with achalasia, PD is associated with improved DI and diameter as measured by FLIP, which is consistent with symptomatic improvement shown by Eckardt score. However, post-PD FLIP parameters did not identify a correlation with the need for subsequent dilation. Further investigation is warranted to establish FLIP-based thresholds that may guide treatment and follow-up planning.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.