S791 Comparative Risk of Gastrointestinal Adverse Events Among GLP-1 Receptor Agonists: A Real-World Multicenter Study

Introduction: GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) have transformed the management of type 2 diabetes and obesity. However, concerns remain regarding gastrointestinal (GI) adverse effects, including gastroparesis, pancreatitis, and gallstone formation. Comparative real-world data across individual agents remain limited. Our aim was to compare the incidence of GI adverse events among patients prescribed different GLP-1 RAs using a large, multicenter electronic health record (EHR) database. Methods: This retrospective cohort study used TriNetX, a U.S. research network of 90+ healthcare systems. Adults (≥18 years) with type 2 diabetes (ICD-10 E11) initiating semaglutide, liraglutide, or exenatide from January 2018 to December 2023 were included. Patients with prior gastroparesis, pancreatitis, cholelithiasis, pancreatic cancer, cirrhosis, or GLP-1 RA use in the prior year were excluded. Cohorts were matched 1:1:1 using propensity scores, adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, HbA1c, diabetes duration, comorbidities (chronic kidney disease, inflammatory bowel disease, gallbladder disease, alcohol use), and medications (metformin, insulin, SGLT2 inhibitors, proton pump inhibitors). Primary outcomes: new-onset gastroparesis, acute pancreatitis, and cholelithiasis. Cox models estimated adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: There were 42,313 eligible patients: semaglutide (n = 19,870), liraglutide (n = 14,621), exenatide (n = 7,822). After matching, 7,000 patients per group (21,000 total) were retained with balanced covariates. Median follow-up: 14.3 months. Gastroparesis: semaglutide 4.2%, liraglutide 3.1%, exenatide 2.3%. Semaglutide vs exenatide: aHR 1.68 (1.29–2.18), P < 0.001. Semaglutide vs liraglutide: aHR 1.42 (1.17–1.74), P = 0.003. Pancreatitis: semaglutide 2.1%, liraglutide 1.7%, exenatide 1.4%. Semaglutide vs exenatide: aHR 1.41 (1.07–1.86), P = 0.015. Cholelithiasis: liraglutide 6.9%, semaglutide 5.1%, exenatide 4.3%. Liraglutide vs exenatide: aHR 1.47 (1.12–1.91), P = 0.004. Liraglutide vs semaglutide: aHR 1.33 (1.01–1.76), P = 0.038. Highest risks were observed in females with BMI ≥30 and diabetes >10 years. Kaplan-Meier curves showed early divergence by 6 months. Conclusion: GI adverse event risk differs across GLP-1 RAs. Semaglutide showed higher risk for gastroparesis and pancreatitis; liraglutide had the highest cholelithiasis risk. These findings support individualized therapy based on patient-specific GI risk.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001130624.52234.9c
Primary Topic
Diabetes Treatment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S791 Comparative Risk of Gastrointestinal Adverse Events Among GLP-1 Receptor Agonists: A Real-World Multicenter Study

Rajdeep Singh, Sarah Meribout, Aaron Tokayer, Bani Chander Roland et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Diabetes Treatment and Management
article

S791 Comparative Risk of Gastrointestinal Adverse Events Among GLP-1 Receptor Agonists: A Real-World Multicenter Study

Rajdeep Singh, Sarah Meribout, Aaron Tokayer, Bani Chander Roland, Avleen Kaur, Mohamed Eldesouki, Gerard E. Mullin, Yuriy Tsirlin, Nakul Mahajan, Abdallah Hussein, Sherif Elhanafi, Omar Abdelhalim, Hazem Abosheaishaa, Ahmed Salem, Joseph Menand, Mohammad Alomari, Islam Mohamed, Samantha F. Ehrlich, Carla Barberan Parraga, Neha Sharma, Fatima Khan, Islam Rajab, Samar Pal S. Sandhu, Tanuj Chokshi, Syed Mujtaba Baqir, Mohammed Abusuliman, MariaLisa Itzoe
article en

Abstract

Introduction: GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) have transformed the management of type 2 diabetes and obesity. However, concerns remain regarding gastrointestinal (GI) adverse effects, including gastroparesis, pancreatitis, and gallstone formation. Comparative real-world data across individual agents remain limited. Our aim was to compare the incidence of GI adverse events among patients prescribed different GLP-1 RAs using a large, multicenter electronic health record (EHR) database. Methods: This retrospective cohort study used TriNetX, a U.S. research network of 90+ healthcare systems. Adults (≥18 years) with type 2 diabetes (ICD-10 E11) initiating semaglutide, liraglutide, or exenatide from January 2018 to December 2023 were included. Patients with prior gastroparesis, pancreatitis, cholelithiasis, pancreatic cancer, cirrhosis, or GLP-1 RA use in the prior year were excluded. Cohorts were matched 1:1:1 using propensity scores, adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, HbA1c, diabetes duration, comorbidities (chronic kidney disease, inflammatory bowel disease, gallbladder disease, alcohol use), and medications (metformin, insulin, SGLT2 inhibitors, proton pump inhibitors). Primary outcomes: new-onset gastroparesis, acute pancreatitis, and cholelithiasis. Cox models estimated adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: There were 42,313 eligible patients: semaglutide (n = 19,870), liraglutide (n = 14,621), exenatide (n = 7,822). After matching, 7,000 patients per group (21,000 total) were retained with balanced covariates. Median follow-up: 14.3 months. Gastroparesis: semaglutide 4.2%, liraglutide 3.1%, exenatide 2.3%. Semaglutide vs exenatide: aHR 1.68 (1.29–2.18), P < 0.001. Semaglutide vs liraglutide: aHR 1.42 (1.17–1.74), P = 0.003. Pancreatitis: semaglutide 2.1%, liraglutide 1.7%, exenatide 1.4%. Semaglutide vs exenatide: aHR 1.41 (1.07–1.86), P = 0.015. Cholelithiasis: liraglutide 6.9%, semaglutide 5.1%, exenatide 4.3%. Liraglutide vs exenatide: aHR 1.47 (1.12–1.91), P = 0.004. Liraglutide vs semaglutide: aHR 1.33 (1.01–1.76), P = 0.038. Highest risks were observed in females with BMI ≥30 and diabetes >10 years. Kaplan-Meier curves showed early divergence by 6 months. Conclusion: GI adverse event risk differs across GLP-1 RAs. Semaglutide showed higher risk for gastroparesis and pancreatitis; liraglutide had the highest cholelithiasis risk. These findings support individualized therapy based on patient-specific GI risk.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Diabetes Treatment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.