S855 Therapeutic Role of Monoclonal Antibodies in Oeosinophilic Esophagitis: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis

Introduction: Advances in the immunopathology of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) have driven the development of monoclonal antibody therapies targeting key inflammatory pathways. This meta-analysis compiles evidence from randomized controlled trials to evaluate the efficacy and safety of monoclonal antibodies in the treatment of EoE. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Google Scholar, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov proceedings through March 2025 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing monoclonal antibodies with placebo in patients with active EoE. Data was extracted into a spreadsheet and the meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4. Outcomes assessed included histologic remission (defined as ≤15 eosinophils/high-power-field), symptomatic response, change in dysphagia scores, and serious adverse events (SAE). Pooled risk ratios (RR) and mean differences (MD) were calculated using random-effects models, with heterogeneity assessed using the I² statistic. Results: Ten RCTs comprising 1,320 patients met inclusion criteria. Monoclonal antibodies significantly increased the rate of histologic remission compared to placebo (RR 7.64; 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.66-15.96; I² = 85%). Symptomatic response was also greater with monoclonal antibodies (RR 1.91; 95% CI 1.03-3.55; I² = 89%). Pooled analysis of change in dysphagia scores demonstrated a non-significant trend favoring monoclonal antibodies (MD -3.72; 95% CI -7.93 to 0.50; I² = 98%). Rates of SAEs were low and not significantly different between groups (RR 1.42; 95% CI 0.54-3.75; I² = 0%). Conclusion: Monoclonal antibodies demonstrate significant efficacy in achieving histologic remission and improving symptomatic response in patients with EoE without an increase in serious adverse events. These findings support their potential role as effective therapeutic agents in EoE management. Further long-term studies are warranted to evaluate durability of response and optimal treatment strategies.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001130880.26900.72
Primary Topic
Eosinophilic Esophagitis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S855 Therapeutic Role of Monoclonal Antibodies in Oeosinophilic Esophagitis: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis

Nayanika Tummala, Harpreet Sandhu, Sarav Daid, Anubhuti Sharma et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Eosinophilic Esophagitis
article

S855 Therapeutic Role of Monoclonal Antibodies in Oeosinophilic Esophagitis: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis

Nayanika Tummala, Harpreet Sandhu, Sarav Daid, Anubhuti Sharma, Pratyush Sachdeva, Simranpreet Singh Daid, Arundhati Sharma, Sagal Pannu
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Advances in the immunopathology of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) have driven the development of monoclonal antibody therapies targeting key inflammatory pathways. This meta-analysis compiles evidence from randomized controlled trials to evaluate the efficacy and safety of monoclonal antibodies in the treatment of EoE. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Google Scholar, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov proceedings through March 2025 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing monoclonal antibodies with placebo in patients with active EoE. Data was extracted into a spreadsheet and the meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4. Outcomes assessed included histologic remission (defined as ≤15 eosinophils/high-power-field), symptomatic response, change in dysphagia scores, and serious adverse events (SAE). Pooled risk ratios (RR) and mean differences (MD) were calculated using random-effects models, with heterogeneity assessed using the I² statistic. Results: Ten RCTs comprising 1,320 patients met inclusion criteria. Monoclonal antibodies significantly increased the rate of histologic remission compared to placebo (RR 7.64; 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.66-15.96; I² = 85%). Symptomatic response was also greater with monoclonal antibodies (RR 1.91; 95% CI 1.03-3.55; I² = 89%). Pooled analysis of change in dysphagia scores demonstrated a non-significant trend favoring monoclonal antibodies (MD -3.72; 95% CI -7.93 to 0.50; I² = 98%). Rates of SAEs were low and not significantly different between groups (RR 1.42; 95% CI 0.54-3.75; I² = 0%). Conclusion: Monoclonal antibodies demonstrate significant efficacy in achieving histologic remission and improving symptomatic response in patients with EoE without an increase in serious adverse events. These findings support their potential role as effective therapeutic agents in EoE management. Further long-term studies are warranted to evaluate durability of response and optimal treatment strategies.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Eosinophilic Esophagitis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.