S699 Patients With Newly Diagnosed Cervical Cancer Should Be Screened for Anal Human Papillomavirus and Anal Dysplasia Utilizing a Markov Model

Introduction: Human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is typically self-limiting, but persistent infection with high-risk HPV subtypes can lead to malignancy. Women with cervical HPV infection are 7 times more likely to have concurrent anal HPV infection. Studies in men who have sex with men (MSM) demonstrate that targeted HPV screening can reduce anal cancer incidence. Our model evaluates the potential benefits and cost-effectiveness of screening for anal HPV and dysplasia among women newly diagnosed with cervical cancer. Methods: We developed a Markov cohort model to simulate disease progression and outcomes over a 20-year period in women newly diagnosed with cervical cancer. Inputs included: initial anal cytology, HPV infection rates, and rates of histological progression and regression (normal to low-grade dysplasia, high-grade dysplasia [HSIL], and anal cancer). Previously published data in MSM populations and cervical cancer survivors were used to input transition rates. The model compared screening, anal HPV testing and treatment of anal HSIL, versus no screening. Costs were derived from 2025 inflation-adjusted rates from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and published literature. Outcomes included anal cancer incidence, anal cancer mortality, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), total and incremental costs, and cost per QALY gained. Results: At 10 years, the screening resulted in 364 cumulative anal cancer cases compared to 620 in the unscreened group. Anal cancer deaths were reduced from 151 to 87 with screening. Total all-cause deaths were 269 with screening vs 346 without. QALYs gained were higher with screening (89,309 vs 85,248), and cumulative costs were lower ($454.4 M screened vs $647.9 M unscreened). By 20 years, screening prevented 1,227 cases of anal cancer, 279 cancer-related deaths, gained an additional 4,061 discounted QALYs, and saved over $193.6 million. Conclusion: The incidence of anal cancer is rising among White and Hispanic women over the age of 65—a demographic also experiencing increased cervical cancer rates and higher mortality. Our model predicts that implementing anal HPV screening with early treatment of HSIL in women diagnosed with cervical cancer reduces the incidence and mortality of anal cancer. Furthermore, it is cost-effective and supports recent International Anal Neoplasia Society guidance recommending screening in this high-risk population.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001130256.11190.a7
Primary Topic
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S699 Patients With Newly Diagnosed Cervical Cancer Should Be Screened for Anal Human Papillomavirus and Anal Dysplasia Utilizing a Markov Model

Eli D. Ehrenpreis, J. M. Cantú, Olivia Foy, Lukus Berber
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
article

S699 Patients With Newly Diagnosed Cervical Cancer Should Be Screened for Anal Human Papillomavirus and Anal Dysplasia Utilizing a Markov Model

Eli D. Ehrenpreis, J. M. Cantú, Olivia Foy, Lukus Berber
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is typically self-limiting, but persistent infection with high-risk HPV subtypes can lead to malignancy. Women with cervical HPV infection are 7 times more likely to have concurrent anal HPV infection. Studies in men who have sex with men (MSM) demonstrate that targeted HPV screening can reduce anal cancer incidence. Our model evaluates the potential benefits and cost-effectiveness of screening for anal HPV and dysplasia among women newly diagnosed with cervical cancer. Methods: We developed a Markov cohort model to simulate disease progression and outcomes over a 20-year period in women newly diagnosed with cervical cancer. Inputs included: initial anal cytology, HPV infection rates, and rates of histological progression and regression (normal to low-grade dysplasia, high-grade dysplasia [HSIL], and anal cancer). Previously published data in MSM populations and cervical cancer survivors were used to input transition rates. The model compared screening, anal HPV testing and treatment of anal HSIL, versus no screening. Costs were derived from 2025 inflation-adjusted rates from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and published literature. Outcomes included anal cancer incidence, anal cancer mortality, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), total and incremental costs, and cost per QALY gained. Results: At 10 years, the screening resulted in 364 cumulative anal cancer cases compared to 620 in the unscreened group. Anal cancer deaths were reduced from 151 to 87 with screening. Total all-cause deaths were 269 with screening vs 346 without. QALYs gained were higher with screening (89,309 vs 85,248), and cumulative costs were lower ($454.4 M screened vs $647.9 M unscreened). By 20 years, screening prevented 1,227 cases of anal cancer, 279 cancer-related deaths, gained an additional 4,061 discounted QALYs, and saved over $193.6 million. Conclusion: The incidence of anal cancer is rising among White and Hispanic women over the age of 65—a demographic also experiencing increased cervical cancer rates and higher mortality. Our model predicts that implementing anal HPV screening with early treatment of HSIL in women diagnosed with cervical cancer reduces the incidence and mortality of anal cancer. Furthermore, it is cost-effective and supports recent International Anal Neoplasia Society guidance recommending screening in this high-risk population.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.