S955 Baseline Characteristics of Patients With Reflux Esophagitis Receiving Vonoprazan Treatment in China: Post Hoc Analysis of the VIEW Real-World Study

Introduction: Vonoprazan, a potassium-competitive acid blocker, is approved in China as a first-line treatment for reflux esophagitis (RE). To better understand the profile of patients receiving vonoprazan in China, this post hoc analysis assessed the baseline characteristics of patients with RE treated with vonoprazan in the real-world VIEW study and the differences in characteristics based on age and disease severity. Methods: VIEW (NCT04501627) was a multicenter, single-arm, prospective, observational, real-world study in China. Patients received 20 mg vonoprazan, orally, once daily for 4 weeks (8 weeks if insufficient healing), followed by a 2-week safety evaluation after treatment. In this post hoc analysis, differences in baseline characteristics and demographics were analyzed by age (<65 vs ≥65 years) and RE severity (mild vs severe). Results: Of the 1,877 patients included in the RE safety analysis population, mean (standard deviation [SD]) age was 49.7 (13.4) years; 64.4% were men, and mean (SD) body mass index was 24.06 (3.47) kg/m2. Most patients had never smoked (73.9%) and never consumed alcohol (73.4%). Los Angeles (LA) classification at baseline showed mild RE with 41.3% in grade A and 27.9% in grade B, and severe RE with 6.1% in grade C and 1.9% in grade D. Barrett’s mucosa was present in 2.5% of patients and esophageal ulceration in 12.8% of patients. Mean total gastroesophageal reflux disease questionnaire (GERDQ) score was 8.4 at baseline. The percentage of patients taking vonoprazan for 4 weeks and 8 weeks was 76.1% and 23.9%, respectively. Patient characteristics that were significantly different by age (<65 vs ≥65 years) included gender (P = 0.004), smoking status (P = 0.003), alcohol consumption (P < 0.001), LA classification (P < 0.001), absence/presence of Barrett’s mucosa (P = 0.005), and total GERDQ score (P = 0.026). Patient characteristics that were significantly different by severity (mild vs severe) were age (P < 0.001); esophageal ulceration (P < 0.001); symptoms at enrollment, including all-day heartburn and regurgitation (P = 0.014), nighttime heartburn (P < 0.001) and nighttime regurgitation (P = 0.003); total GERDQ score (P = 0.020); and vonoprazan treatment duration (P < 0.001). Conclusion: This post hoc analysis revealed significant variation in the key baseline characteristics of patients with RE treated with vonoprazan in China, based on age and disease severity.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001131280.27545.ad
Primary Topic
Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S955 Baseline Characteristics of Patients With Reflux Esophagitis Receiving Vonoprazan Treatment in China: Post Hoc Analysis of the VIEW Real-World Study

Kailun Liang, Fang Zhou, Yinglian Xiao, Minhu Chen
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
article

S955 Baseline Characteristics of Patients With Reflux Esophagitis Receiving Vonoprazan Treatment in China: Post Hoc Analysis of the VIEW Real-World Study

Kailun Liang, Fang Zhou, Yinglian Xiao, Minhu Chen
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Vonoprazan, a potassium-competitive acid blocker, is approved in China as a first-line treatment for reflux esophagitis (RE). To better understand the profile of patients receiving vonoprazan in China, this post hoc analysis assessed the baseline characteristics of patients with RE treated with vonoprazan in the real-world VIEW study and the differences in characteristics based on age and disease severity. Methods: VIEW (NCT04501627) was a multicenter, single-arm, prospective, observational, real-world study in China. Patients received 20 mg vonoprazan, orally, once daily for 4 weeks (8 weeks if insufficient healing), followed by a 2-week safety evaluation after treatment. In this post hoc analysis, differences in baseline characteristics and demographics were analyzed by age (<65 vs ≥65 years) and RE severity (mild vs severe). Results: Of the 1,877 patients included in the RE safety analysis population, mean (standard deviation [SD]) age was 49.7 (13.4) years; 64.4% were men, and mean (SD) body mass index was 24.06 (3.47) kg/m2. Most patients had never smoked (73.9%) and never consumed alcohol (73.4%). Los Angeles (LA) classification at baseline showed mild RE with 41.3% in grade A and 27.9% in grade B, and severe RE with 6.1% in grade C and 1.9% in grade D. Barrett’s mucosa was present in 2.5% of patients and esophageal ulceration in 12.8% of patients. Mean total gastroesophageal reflux disease questionnaire (GERDQ) score was 8.4 at baseline. The percentage of patients taking vonoprazan for 4 weeks and 8 weeks was 76.1% and 23.9%, respectively. Patient characteristics that were significantly different by age (<65 vs ≥65 years) included gender (P = 0.004), smoking status (P = 0.003), alcohol consumption (P < 0.001), LA classification (P < 0.001), absence/presence of Barrett’s mucosa (P = 0.005), and total GERDQ score (P = 0.026). Patient characteristics that were significantly different by severity (mild vs severe) were age (P < 0.001); esophageal ulceration (P < 0.001); symptoms at enrollment, including all-day heartburn and regurgitation (P = 0.014), nighttime heartburn (P < 0.001) and nighttime regurgitation (P = 0.003); total GERDQ score (P = 0.020); and vonoprazan treatment duration (P < 0.001). Conclusion: This post hoc analysis revealed significant variation in the key baseline characteristics of patients with RE treated with vonoprazan in China, based on age and disease severity.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.