S956 Clinical and Demographic Predictors of Peptic Stricture: A Cohort Study of Over 5 Million GERD Patients Using a Large U.S. National Health Record Database

Introduction: Peptic stricture is a common complication of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), yet population-level data on risk factors for its formation are limited. This study aimed to identify demographic, clinical, and medication exposure predictors of esophageal stricture in a large national cohort of GERD patients. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using TriNetX, a federated electronic health record database. Adults diagnosed with GERD from 2015-2020 were selected. Patients were stratified by subsequent development of esophageal stricture, defined using diagnosis and procedure codes. Demographic characteristics, comorbidities, and medication use were compared between groups. Only patients who underwent endoscopy were included in comparative analysis. Results: There were 5,035,574 patients with GERD. At a mean (standard deviation) follow-up of 4.88 (3.6) years, 165,017 (3.4%) developed esophageal stricture, with a median time from GERD diagnosis to stricture of 888 days. Of the GERD population, 1,280,887 patients (25.4%) underwent endoscopy. This group was divided based on the presence or absence of esophageal stricture. Stricture formation was more likely in older and White patients. Asian patients were less likely to form strictures (odds ratio [OR] 0.43). Hiatal hernia and esophagitis were strong clinical predictors of stricture. Barrett’s esophagus was also more prevalent. Stricture was associated with subsequent esophageal cancer (0.36% vs 0.13%; OR 2.85 [2.6-3.1]; P < 0.0001). Aspiration pneumonia was more common in patients with stricture (7.1% vs 4.1%; OR 1.79 [1.75-1.83]; P < 0.0001]. Among systemic comorbidities, scleroderma had the strongest association. In contrast, Helicobacter pylori (OR 0.50) and Crohn’s disease (OR 0.84) were protective. Strictures were slightly more common in selective and non-selective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, as well as glucocorticoids, particularly dexamethasone and budesonide. Conclusion: Peptic stricture in GERD reflects a distinct clinical phenotype, characterized by older age, White race, hiatal hernia, and inflammatory injury. Strong associations with esophageal cancer and aspiration pneumonia underscore the serious implications of this complication. Inverse associations with Helicobacter pylori and Asian race suggest biological or environmental factors influence progression. These findings highlight the heterogeneity of GERD and support a personalized, risk-based approach to surveillance and management.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001131284.31875.24
Primary Topic
Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S956 Clinical and Demographic Predictors of Peptic Stricture: A Cohort Study of Over 5 Million GERD Patients Using a Large U.S. National Health Record Database

Sven V. Eriksson, Inanc Sarici, Shahin Ayazi, Ping Zheng
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
article

S956 Clinical and Demographic Predictors of Peptic Stricture: A Cohort Study of Over 5 Million GERD Patients Using a Large U.S. National Health Record Database

Sven V. Eriksson, Inanc Sarici, Shahin Ayazi, Ping Zheng
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Peptic stricture is a common complication of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), yet population-level data on risk factors for its formation are limited. This study aimed to identify demographic, clinical, and medication exposure predictors of esophageal stricture in a large national cohort of GERD patients. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using TriNetX, a federated electronic health record database. Adults diagnosed with GERD from 2015-2020 were selected. Patients were stratified by subsequent development of esophageal stricture, defined using diagnosis and procedure codes. Demographic characteristics, comorbidities, and medication use were compared between groups. Only patients who underwent endoscopy were included in comparative analysis. Results: There were 5,035,574 patients with GERD. At a mean (standard deviation) follow-up of 4.88 (3.6) years, 165,017 (3.4%) developed esophageal stricture, with a median time from GERD diagnosis to stricture of 888 days. Of the GERD population, 1,280,887 patients (25.4%) underwent endoscopy. This group was divided based on the presence or absence of esophageal stricture. Stricture formation was more likely in older and White patients. Asian patients were less likely to form strictures (odds ratio [OR] 0.43). Hiatal hernia and esophagitis were strong clinical predictors of stricture. Barrett’s esophagus was also more prevalent. Stricture was associated with subsequent esophageal cancer (0.36% vs 0.13%; OR 2.85 [2.6-3.1]; P < 0.0001). Aspiration pneumonia was more common in patients with stricture (7.1% vs 4.1%; OR 1.79 [1.75-1.83]; P < 0.0001]. Among systemic comorbidities, scleroderma had the strongest association. In contrast, Helicobacter pylori (OR 0.50) and Crohn’s disease (OR 0.84) were protective. Strictures were slightly more common in selective and non-selective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, as well as glucocorticoids, particularly dexamethasone and budesonide. Conclusion: Peptic stricture in GERD reflects a distinct clinical phenotype, characterized by older age, White race, hiatal hernia, and inflammatory injury. Strong associations with esophageal cancer and aspiration pneumonia underscore the serious implications of this complication. Inverse associations with Helicobacter pylori and Asian race suggest biological or environmental factors influence progression. These findings highlight the heterogeneity of GERD and support a personalized, risk-based approach to surveillance and management.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.