S863 Abnormalities on Barium Esophagram Predict Esophageal Structural and Motility Disorders in Patients With Dysphagia Symptoms

Introduction: Barium esophagram is a dynamic radiologic study used to evaluate esophageal anatomy, presence of hiatal hernias, diverticula, and strictures. It may also suggest swallowing disorders, reflux, and dysmotility, though it is not validated for diagnosing motility disorders. High-resolution esophageal manometry remains the gold standard for assessing motility, while esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is the reference for identifying structural and mucosal etiologies of esophageal dysphagia. Given the non-invasive nature and relative widespread availability of esophagram, this study aimed to assess its concordance with EGD and manometry in diagnosing structural and motility-related causes of esophageal dysphagia. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of adults referred to gastroenterology for dysphagia between September 2017 and August 2023. Patients who underwent both esophagram and either manometry or EGD within one year were included. Collected data included demographics, initial gastroenterology notes, and results of esophageal testing. Concordance between esophagram findings and subsequent manometry or EGD results was assessed using Chi-squared tests. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of esophagram were calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: Of 199 referrals, 69 patients underwent esophagram; 20 also had manometry and 29 underwent EGD. Esophagram identified dysmotility in 31 cases (45.6%), and manometry confirmed dysmotility in 8 (40.0%), showing significant concordance (P < 0.001). Sensitivity and specificity for detecting dysmotility were 100% (CI 63.1-100%) and 75% (CI 42.8-94.5%), respectively. Structural abnormalities were seen in 15 esophagrams (22.1%) and 9 EGDs (31.0%), with significant concordance (P = 0.01). Sensitivity and specificity for structural abnormalities were 55.6% (CI 21.2-86.3%) and 90% (CI 68.3-98.8%), respectively. Conclusion: Barium esophagram demonstrates strong concordance with manometry and EGD in identifying both motility and structural abnormalities. It may serve as a valuable first-line tool in the evaluation of esophageal dysphagia, particularly in patients seeking non-invasive options or those with higher procedural risks.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001130912.91772.15
Primary Topic
Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S863 Abnormalities on Barium Esophagram Predict Esophageal Structural and Motility Disorders in Patients With Dysphagia Symptoms

Sabrina Chen, Connie W. Wang, Priya Kathpalia, Diana Partida
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
article

S863 Abnormalities on Barium Esophagram Predict Esophageal Structural and Motility Disorders in Patients With Dysphagia Symptoms

Sabrina Chen, Connie W. Wang, Priya Kathpalia, Diana Partida
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Barium esophagram is a dynamic radiologic study used to evaluate esophageal anatomy, presence of hiatal hernias, diverticula, and strictures. It may also suggest swallowing disorders, reflux, and dysmotility, though it is not validated for diagnosing motility disorders. High-resolution esophageal manometry remains the gold standard for assessing motility, while esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is the reference for identifying structural and mucosal etiologies of esophageal dysphagia. Given the non-invasive nature and relative widespread availability of esophagram, this study aimed to assess its concordance with EGD and manometry in diagnosing structural and motility-related causes of esophageal dysphagia. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of adults referred to gastroenterology for dysphagia between September 2017 and August 2023. Patients who underwent both esophagram and either manometry or EGD within one year were included. Collected data included demographics, initial gastroenterology notes, and results of esophageal testing. Concordance between esophagram findings and subsequent manometry or EGD results was assessed using Chi-squared tests. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of esophagram were calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: Of 199 referrals, 69 patients underwent esophagram; 20 also had manometry and 29 underwent EGD. Esophagram identified dysmotility in 31 cases (45.6%), and manometry confirmed dysmotility in 8 (40.0%), showing significant concordance (P < 0.001). Sensitivity and specificity for detecting dysmotility were 100% (CI 63.1-100%) and 75% (CI 42.8-94.5%), respectively. Structural abnormalities were seen in 15 esophagrams (22.1%) and 9 EGDs (31.0%), with significant concordance (P = 0.01). Sensitivity and specificity for structural abnormalities were 55.6% (CI 21.2-86.3%) and 90% (CI 68.3-98.8%), respectively. Conclusion: Barium esophagram demonstrates strong concordance with manometry and EGD in identifying both motility and structural abnormalities. It may serve as a valuable first-line tool in the evaluation of esophageal dysphagia, particularly in patients seeking non-invasive options or those with higher procedural risks.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.