S928 Outcomes After Endoscopic Resection for Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: Insights into Curative Potential and Prognostic Indicators

Introduction: Endoscopic resections (ER) with curative intent are routinely performed on newly diagnosed esophageal adenocarcinomas (EAC). Few studies exist correlating pathological features in ERs and clinical outcomes. This retrospective study examines the significance of standard clinical and ER pathologic features from a single tertiary-care institution and their association with patient outcome. Methods: A retrospective study of EAC patients who underwent endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR)/endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) from 2004-2023 was performed. Pathologic features of ER specimens were assessed along with clinical outcomes. Outcomes assessed included local/regional recurrence, follow-up ER or esophagectomy, and disease-specific mortality. Follow-up was recorded in months and correlated with pathology findings. Results: Fifty-seven ER patients were identified. Fifty-three patients underwent EMR, 4 ESD. Median follow-up was 53 months [range 3-1002]. Thirty-four patients underwent 1 ER, 5 underwent follow-up ER after primary resection. Eighteen patients underwent follow-up esophagectomy—14 patients had no evidence of recurrence with a median follow-up of 66 months (range 16-195), and 1 patient developed evidence of distant metastases. Pathologic features: 2 of 9 Grade 3 EACs; 4 of 5 with lymphovascular invasion (LVI), 14 of 30 with deep margin positive, 13 of 23 with mucosal margin positive had poor outcomes. Only 6 of 26 fragmented specimens were associated with poor outcomes. Conclusion: Our findings support the curative potential of endoscopic resection for the majority patients with superficial EAC. Though recurrence rates are low in these preselected patients, pathological assessments of tumor grade, LVI, and margin status, especially deep margin, emerged as important predictors of recurrence. Consideration of EAC endoscopic resection pathological findings is central to ongoing surveillance of these high-risk patients.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001131172.51231.0a
Primary Topic
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S928 Outcomes After Endoscopic Resection for Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: Insights into Curative Potential and Prognostic Indicators

Amitabh Chak, Joseph Willis, Amna Anzar
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
article

S928 Outcomes After Endoscopic Resection for Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: Insights into Curative Potential and Prognostic Indicators

Amitabh Chak, Joseph Willis, Amna Anzar
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Endoscopic resections (ER) with curative intent are routinely performed on newly diagnosed esophageal adenocarcinomas (EAC). Few studies exist correlating pathological features in ERs and clinical outcomes. This retrospective study examines the significance of standard clinical and ER pathologic features from a single tertiary-care institution and their association with patient outcome. Methods: A retrospective study of EAC patients who underwent endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR)/endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) from 2004-2023 was performed. Pathologic features of ER specimens were assessed along with clinical outcomes. Outcomes assessed included local/regional recurrence, follow-up ER or esophagectomy, and disease-specific mortality. Follow-up was recorded in months and correlated with pathology findings. Results: Fifty-seven ER patients were identified. Fifty-three patients underwent EMR, 4 ESD. Median follow-up was 53 months [range 3-1002]. Thirty-four patients underwent 1 ER, 5 underwent follow-up ER after primary resection. Eighteen patients underwent follow-up esophagectomy—14 patients had no evidence of recurrence with a median follow-up of 66 months (range 16-195), and 1 patient developed evidence of distant metastases. Pathologic features: 2 of 9 Grade 3 EACs; 4 of 5 with lymphovascular invasion (LVI), 14 of 30 with deep margin positive, 13 of 23 with mucosal margin positive had poor outcomes. Only 6 of 26 fragmented specimens were associated with poor outcomes. Conclusion: Our findings support the curative potential of endoscopic resection for the majority patients with superficial EAC. Though recurrence rates are low in these preselected patients, pathological assessments of tumor grade, LVI, and margin status, especially deep margin, emerged as important predictors of recurrence. Consideration of EAC endoscopic resection pathological findings is central to ongoing surveillance of these high-risk patients.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

S928 Outcomes After Endoscopic Resection for Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: Insights into Curative Potential and Prognostic Indicators — Amitabh Chak, Joseph Willis, et al. · The American Journal of Gastroenterology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS