S969 Underinsured, Undermonitored, Undermined: Real-World Data on EoE Disparities

Introduction: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic immune-mediated esophageal disorder with rising incidence in the United States. Optimal management relies on timely clinical evaluations and endoscopic monitoring to assess both clinical and histological remission. Given the potential disparities in healthcare access, we hypothesized that insurance status may significantly influence treatment outcomes in patients with EoE. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted on patients diagnosed with EoE at a tertiary care center between January 2016 and December 2021. Patients were stratified based on insurance status into insured and uninsured groups. Demographic variables, treatment response, follow-up adherence, and histological outcomes were compared. Statistical analyses included Chi-square or Fisher's exact tests for categorical variables and t tests for continuous variables. Results: Fifty-five patients were included; 48 (87.3%) were insured and 7 (12.7%) were uninsured. There were no significant differences in baseline demographics. Clinical improvement was reported in 89.6% of insured patients compared to 42.9% in the uninsured group (P < 0.001). Repeat esophagogastroduodenoscopy was performed in 72.9% of insured versus 28.6% of uninsured patients (P = 0.019). Histologic remission was achieved in 83.4% of insured patients versus none in the uninsured group. Missed gastroenterology follow-up appointments were numerically higher in the uninsured group (57.1% vs 41.7%; P = 0.44), though this was not statistically significant. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that insurance status is a critical determinant of clinical, endoscopic, and histologic outcomes in patients with EoE. Uninsured patients were significantly less likely to undergo follow-up endoscopies, achieve symptom improvement, or reach histologic remission. These results highlight the need for improved access to care and structured follow-up in underserved populations with EoE.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001131336.77908.92
Primary Topic
Eosinophilic Esophagitis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S969 Underinsured, Undermonitored, Undermined: Real-World Data on EoE Disparities

Hassan Ghoz, Wael T. Mohamed
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Eosinophilic Esophagitis
article

S969 Underinsured, Undermonitored, Undermined: Real-World Data on EoE Disparities

Hassan Ghoz, Wael T. Mohamed
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic immune-mediated esophageal disorder with rising incidence in the United States. Optimal management relies on timely clinical evaluations and endoscopic monitoring to assess both clinical and histological remission. Given the potential disparities in healthcare access, we hypothesized that insurance status may significantly influence treatment outcomes in patients with EoE. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted on patients diagnosed with EoE at a tertiary care center between January 2016 and December 2021. Patients were stratified based on insurance status into insured and uninsured groups. Demographic variables, treatment response, follow-up adherence, and histological outcomes were compared. Statistical analyses included Chi-square or Fisher's exact tests for categorical variables and t tests for continuous variables. Results: Fifty-five patients were included; 48 (87.3%) were insured and 7 (12.7%) were uninsured. There were no significant differences in baseline demographics. Clinical improvement was reported in 89.6% of insured patients compared to 42.9% in the uninsured group (P < 0.001). Repeat esophagogastroduodenoscopy was performed in 72.9% of insured versus 28.6% of uninsured patients (P = 0.019). Histologic remission was achieved in 83.4% of insured patients versus none in the uninsured group. Missed gastroenterology follow-up appointments were numerically higher in the uninsured group (57.1% vs 41.7%; P = 0.44), though this was not statistically significant. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that insurance status is a critical determinant of clinical, endoscopic, and histologic outcomes in patients with EoE. Uninsured patients were significantly less likely to undergo follow-up endoscopies, achieve symptom improvement, or reach histologic remission. These results highlight the need for improved access to care and structured follow-up in underserved populations with EoE.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Eosinophilic Esophagitis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.