S933 Comparative Outcomes of GE Junction Cancer in Patients With Barrett's Esophagus versus GERD: A Real-World Data Analysis Using the TriNetX Network

Introduction: Barrett’s esophagus (BE) is a known precursor to esophageal adenocarcinoma, yet the differential risk of gastroesophageal (GE) junction cancer in BE versus gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) without BE remains underexplored. This study aims to leverage a large multi-institutional database to assess the comparative incidence and outcomes of GE junction malignancies among these populations. Methods: A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted using the TriNetX U.S. Collaborative Network database comprising 69 healthcare organizations. Adults (≥18 years) with BE (Cohort 1, N = 397,409) or GERD without BE (Cohort 2, N = 9,824,193) were identified using International Classification of Diseases CD-10 codes. After 1:1 propensity score matching for demographics, diagnoses, and medications, each cohort included 391,695 patients. Outcomes analyzed included GE junction cancer, 5-year mortality, metastases, and chemotherapy use. Measures of association and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were performed. Results: Incidence of GE junction cancer was significantly higher in the BE cohort (1.9%) compared to GERD (0.3%), with a risk ratio of 5.86 (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.52-6.21; P < 0.001). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed lower survival probability in BE patients (96.37% vs 99.37%; P < 0.001). Five-year mortality was slightly lower in BE (10.5%) versus GERD (11.4%) with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.84 (95% CI 0.83-0.85; P < 0.001). Metastatic disease was also slightly lower in BE (3.2% vs 3.7%; HR: 0.82; P < 0.001). Chemotherapy use was marginally lower in BE (0.8% vs 0.9%; HR: 0.85; P < 0.001). Conclusion: Patients with BE have a markedly higher risk of developing GE junction cancer compared to those with GERD alone, underscoring the need for vigilant surveillance. Interestingly, BE patients showed slightly better long-term survival outcomes and lower rates of metastases and chemotherapy utilization, warranting further investigation into disease biology and treatment patterns.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001131192.41079.f4
Primary Topic
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S933 Comparative Outcomes of GE Junction Cancer in Patients With Barrett's Esophagus versus GERD: A Real-World Data Analysis Using the TriNetX Network

Pir Ahmad Shah, Aalam Sohal, Indu Srinivasan, Sunny Kumar et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
article

S933 Comparative Outcomes of GE Junction Cancer in Patients With Barrett's Esophagus versus GERD: A Real-World Data Analysis Using the TriNetX Network

Pir Ahmad Shah, Aalam Sohal, Indu Srinivasan, Sunny Kumar, Vikash Kumar, A. H. Mann, Wael Youssef, Ashujot K. Dang
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Barrett’s esophagus (BE) is a known precursor to esophageal adenocarcinoma, yet the differential risk of gastroesophageal (GE) junction cancer in BE versus gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) without BE remains underexplored. This study aims to leverage a large multi-institutional database to assess the comparative incidence and outcomes of GE junction malignancies among these populations. Methods: A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted using the TriNetX U.S. Collaborative Network database comprising 69 healthcare organizations. Adults (≥18 years) with BE (Cohort 1, N = 397,409) or GERD without BE (Cohort 2, N = 9,824,193) were identified using International Classification of Diseases CD-10 codes. After 1:1 propensity score matching for demographics, diagnoses, and medications, each cohort included 391,695 patients. Outcomes analyzed included GE junction cancer, 5-year mortality, metastases, and chemotherapy use. Measures of association and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were performed. Results: Incidence of GE junction cancer was significantly higher in the BE cohort (1.9%) compared to GERD (0.3%), with a risk ratio of 5.86 (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.52-6.21; P < 0.001). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed lower survival probability in BE patients (96.37% vs 99.37%; P < 0.001). Five-year mortality was slightly lower in BE (10.5%) versus GERD (11.4%) with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.84 (95% CI 0.83-0.85; P < 0.001). Metastatic disease was also slightly lower in BE (3.2% vs 3.7%; HR: 0.82; P < 0.001). Chemotherapy use was marginally lower in BE (0.8% vs 0.9%; HR: 0.85; P < 0.001). Conclusion: Patients with BE have a markedly higher risk of developing GE junction cancer compared to those with GERD alone, underscoring the need for vigilant surveillance. Interestingly, BE patients showed slightly better long-term survival outcomes and lower rates of metastases and chemotherapy utilization, warranting further investigation into disease biology and treatment patterns.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.