S886 Artificial Intelligence-Based Radiomic Prediction of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Treatment Response in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy

Introduction: Accurate prediction of pathological response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) remains a major clinical challenge. While current predictors are inadequate, artificial intelligence (AI)-driven radiomics offers a transformative approach. This meta-analysis evaluates the performance of AI-based radiomics for predicting nCRT response, which directly addresses the need for personalized therapeutic strategies. Methods: We conducted a PRISMA-compliant systematic review, searching PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane through March 2025. Original studies developing and testing AI-radiomic models (machine/deep learning) to predict pathological response in ESCC post-nCRT were included. Methodological quality was assessed via QUADAS-2. Bivariate random-effects models pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) (95% confidence interval [CI]), with heterogeneity quantified using I² statistics. PROSPERO ID: (CRD420251024295). Results: Ten studies and 1,519 patients were included in our analysis. Radiomics achieved the following diagnostic test measures: (sensitivity: 0.804; 95% CI 0.75-0.85; I² = 66.5%; P < 0.001), (specificity: 0.816; 95% CI 0.78-0.85; I² = 51.0%; P < 0.001), and (AUC: 0.85; 95% CI 0.81-0.88; I² = 86.7%; P < 0.0001). Heterogeneity reflected variations in radiomic feature extraction but was balanced by consistent endpoint assessment (Mandard Tumor Regression Grade 1-2). Eighty percent of the included studies showed low bias risk. Conclusion: AI-based radiomics demonstrates high discriminatory power (AUC 0.85) for stratifying ESCC patients by nCRT response likelihood. This supports its clinical utility in guiding treatment intensification in predicted poor responders, enabling personalized de-escalation (e.g., organ preservation) in predicted responders, and potentially reducing unnecessary surgery. Prospective multicenter validation and standardized radiomic pipelines are imperative for clinical adoption.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001131004.50755.ff
Primary Topic
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S886 Artificial Intelligence-Based Radiomic Prediction of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Treatment Response in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy

Basant Elsayed, Ismail Elkhattib, Zainab Ali Hussein, Timothy S. Boyd et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
article

S886 Artificial Intelligence-Based Radiomic Prediction of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Treatment Response in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy

Basant Elsayed, Ismail Elkhattib, Zainab Ali Hussein, Timothy S. Boyd, Mohamed Y. El‐Naggar, Omar F. Abbas, Ahmed Bahnasy, Jubran Khaled Alzedaar, Mark Nasseem
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Accurate prediction of pathological response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) remains a major clinical challenge. While current predictors are inadequate, artificial intelligence (AI)-driven radiomics offers a transformative approach. This meta-analysis evaluates the performance of AI-based radiomics for predicting nCRT response, which directly addresses the need for personalized therapeutic strategies. Methods: We conducted a PRISMA-compliant systematic review, searching PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane through March 2025. Original studies developing and testing AI-radiomic models (machine/deep learning) to predict pathological response in ESCC post-nCRT were included. Methodological quality was assessed via QUADAS-2. Bivariate random-effects models pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) (95% confidence interval [CI]), with heterogeneity quantified using I² statistics. PROSPERO ID: (CRD420251024295). Results: Ten studies and 1,519 patients were included in our analysis. Radiomics achieved the following diagnostic test measures: (sensitivity: 0.804; 95% CI 0.75-0.85; I² = 66.5%; P < 0.001), (specificity: 0.816; 95% CI 0.78-0.85; I² = 51.0%; P < 0.001), and (AUC: 0.85; 95% CI 0.81-0.88; I² = 86.7%; P < 0.0001). Heterogeneity reflected variations in radiomic feature extraction but was balanced by consistent endpoint assessment (Mandard Tumor Regression Grade 1-2). Eighty percent of the included studies showed low bias risk. Conclusion: AI-based radiomics demonstrates high discriminatory power (AUC 0.85) for stratifying ESCC patients by nCRT response likelihood. This supports its clinical utility in guiding treatment intensification in predicted poor responders, enabling personalized de-escalation (e.g., organ preservation) in predicted responders, and potentially reducing unnecessary surgery. Prospective multicenter validation and standardized radiomic pipelines are imperative for clinical adoption.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.