S944 Efficacy of Prophylactic Stent Placement to Prevent Esophageal Stricture After Esophageal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Introduction: Esophageal stricture is a major concern after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in patients with esophageal lesions. Different prophylactic methods to prevent stricture formation have been explored. In this meta-analysis, we have evaluated the efficacy of prophylactic fully covered metal stent placement to prevent esophageal strictures after esophageal ESD. Methods: We reviewed several databases from inception to May 10, 2025, to identify studies that evaluated the efficacy and safety of prophylactic esophageal stent placement to prevent esophageal strictures after ESD. Our outcomes of interest were rates of esophageal strictures and need for balloon dilation after esophageal stent placement. We also compared rates of stricture and mean number of balloon dilation sessions after stent alone vs polyglycolic acid (PGA) sheet + stent. We calculated pooled rates with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for our outcomes of interest. For comparatives outcomes, we calculated odds ratios (OR) (95% CI) for categorical data and mean difference (MD) (95% CI) for continuous data. Data was analyzed using a random effect model. Heterogeneity was assessed using I2 statistic. Results: We included 5 studies (2 randomized controlled trials and 3 observational) in the final analysis. The mean age of the patients was 64.5 (3.05) years. Pooled rates (95% CI) of esophageal stricture after prophylactic stent placement were 20.9% (13.8%, 30.8%; P = 0.48; I² = 0%. Comparative analysis of PGA + stent vs stent alone showed that PGA + stent was associated with lower rates of strictures, OR 0.41 (0.23, 0.74); P = 0.003; I² = 0%, and lower number of endoscopic balloon dilatation sessions, MD -1.65 (-2.40, 0.90); P < 0.0001; I² = 0%. Conclusion: Our meta-analysis demonstrates the efficacy of prophylactic esophageal stent placement to prevent esophageal strictures after ESD. PGA + stents were associated with lower rates of esophageal strictures compared to stents alone. More studies with larger sample sizes are needed to further evaluate these findings.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001131236.62269.92
Primary Topic
Esophageal and GI Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S944 Efficacy of Prophylactic Stent Placement to Prevent Esophageal Stricture After Esophageal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Tayyab Mushtaq, Ahmad Zain, Aamir Saeed, Mark Radlinski et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Esophageal and GI Pathology
article

S944 Efficacy of Prophylactic Stent Placement to Prevent Esophageal Stricture After Esophageal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Tayyab Mushtaq, Ahmad Zain, Aamir Saeed, Mark Radlinski, Hoda Ali, Umar Hayat, Nilay Bhatt, Nasir Saleem, Sultan Mahmood, Hina Akbar, Faisal Kamal, Saira Yousuf
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Esophageal stricture is a major concern after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in patients with esophageal lesions. Different prophylactic methods to prevent stricture formation have been explored. In this meta-analysis, we have evaluated the efficacy of prophylactic fully covered metal stent placement to prevent esophageal strictures after esophageal ESD. Methods: We reviewed several databases from inception to May 10, 2025, to identify studies that evaluated the efficacy and safety of prophylactic esophageal stent placement to prevent esophageal strictures after ESD. Our outcomes of interest were rates of esophageal strictures and need for balloon dilation after esophageal stent placement. We also compared rates of stricture and mean number of balloon dilation sessions after stent alone vs polyglycolic acid (PGA) sheet + stent. We calculated pooled rates with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for our outcomes of interest. For comparatives outcomes, we calculated odds ratios (OR) (95% CI) for categorical data and mean difference (MD) (95% CI) for continuous data. Data was analyzed using a random effect model. Heterogeneity was assessed using I2 statistic. Results: We included 5 studies (2 randomized controlled trials and 3 observational) in the final analysis. The mean age of the patients was 64.5 (3.05) years. Pooled rates (95% CI) of esophageal stricture after prophylactic stent placement were 20.9% (13.8%, 30.8%; P = 0.48; I² = 0%. Comparative analysis of PGA + stent vs stent alone showed that PGA + stent was associated with lower rates of strictures, OR 0.41 (0.23, 0.74); P = 0.003; I² = 0%, and lower number of endoscopic balloon dilatation sessions, MD -1.65 (-2.40, 0.90); P < 0.0001; I² = 0%. Conclusion: Our meta-analysis demonstrates the efficacy of prophylactic esophageal stent placement to prevent esophageal strictures after ESD. PGA + stents were associated with lower rates of esophageal strictures compared to stents alone. More studies with larger sample sizes are needed to further evaluate these findings.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Esophageal and GI Pathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.