S1080 Transforming EoE Care in the Littles: Education on Early Adoption of Novel EoE Therapy

Introduction: The treatment landscape for eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) in young children (≤11 years) has evolved with the expanded U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval of a biologic therapy for this younger age group. This advancement reduces reliance on restrictive diets and off-label treatments, expanding evidence-based options for care. We assessed the impact of online continuing medical education (CME) and patient/caregiver (P/C) education on health care providers’ (HCPs’) awareness of pediatric EoE management and P/Cs’ readiness to engage in shared decision-making. Methods: One 60-minute CME session and 1 30-minute P/C session were launched live online in November 2024 and made available on-demand for 1 year. Pre/post assessments evaluated knowledge, attitudes, and intended practice changes. Cohort analysis for learning gains was performed among intended HCP learners (allergy/immunology and gastroenterology specialties; N = 50). Chi-square tests compared paired responses (P < 0.05; pre/post). Results: As of May 2025, 581 HCPs and 605 P/Cs participated in the programs. Of HCPs, 54% treat patients ≤11 years of age with suspected or confirmed EoE, only 8% of whom were on a biologic therapy. Pre-activity, 81% of HCPs reported satisfaction with symptom improvement, nearly double the rate reported by P/Cs. Post-activity, knowledge gains among intended learners included improved recognition of EoE symptoms (+27%; P < 0.5) and understanding of biologic safety and efficacy data in young children (+7; NS). Other than cost, barriers to biologic use included P/Cs’ reluctance to use an injectable agent or adherence issues (31%), confusion regarding biologic candidacy (15%), and lack of detailed knowledge about biologic agents (12%). Among P/Cs, 42% reported not being satisfied with their EoE treatment, were unsure, or found it helped a little. Most P/Cs (66%) took the program to learn about EoE treatment. Post-activity, 43% would consider changing treatment and 47% would consider a biologic therapy. Similarly, 77% of HCPs not previously using a biologic said they would consider using it. Conclusion: Online education effectively increased readiness to adopt novel EoE therapies for young children among HCPs and P/Cs. The findings suggest disconnects between HCPs and P/Cs in treatment satisfaction and barriers to new treatments, highlighting the need for improved communication to support patient-centered care. (The education only was supported by an unrestricted educational grant from Regeneron Pharmaceutical, Inc., and Sanofi.).

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001131780.39542.b1
Primary Topic
Eosinophilic Esophagitis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S1080 Transforming EoE Care in the Littles: Education on Early Adoption of Novel EoE Therapy

Bethany Doerfler, Mirna Chehade, Carole Drexel, Charlotte C. Rensberger et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Eosinophilic Esophagitis
article

S1080 Transforming EoE Care in the Littles: Education on Early Adoption of Novel EoE Therapy

Bethany Doerfler, Mirna Chehade, Carole Drexel, Charlotte C. Rensberger, Amy Kousouros, Kristin Dellavolpe, Elisa Zizza
article en

Abstract

Introduction: The treatment landscape for eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) in young children (≤11 years) has evolved with the expanded U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval of a biologic therapy for this younger age group. This advancement reduces reliance on restrictive diets and off-label treatments, expanding evidence-based options for care. We assessed the impact of online continuing medical education (CME) and patient/caregiver (P/C) education on health care providers’ (HCPs’) awareness of pediatric EoE management and P/Cs’ readiness to engage in shared decision-making. Methods: One 60-minute CME session and 1 30-minute P/C session were launched live online in November 2024 and made available on-demand for 1 year. Pre/post assessments evaluated knowledge, attitudes, and intended practice changes. Cohort analysis for learning gains was performed among intended HCP learners (allergy/immunology and gastroenterology specialties; N = 50). Chi-square tests compared paired responses (P < 0.05; pre/post). Results: As of May 2025, 581 HCPs and 605 P/Cs participated in the programs. Of HCPs, 54% treat patients ≤11 years of age with suspected or confirmed EoE, only 8% of whom were on a biologic therapy. Pre-activity, 81% of HCPs reported satisfaction with symptom improvement, nearly double the rate reported by P/Cs. Post-activity, knowledge gains among intended learners included improved recognition of EoE symptoms (+27%; P < 0.5) and understanding of biologic safety and efficacy data in young children (+7; NS). Other than cost, barriers to biologic use included P/Cs’ reluctance to use an injectable agent or adherence issues (31%), confusion regarding biologic candidacy (15%), and lack of detailed knowledge about biologic agents (12%). Among P/Cs, 42% reported not being satisfied with their EoE treatment, were unsure, or found it helped a little. Most P/Cs (66%) took the program to learn about EoE treatment. Post-activity, 43% would consider changing treatment and 47% would consider a biologic therapy. Similarly, 77% of HCPs not previously using a biologic said they would consider using it. Conclusion: Online education effectively increased readiness to adopt novel EoE therapies for young children among HCPs and P/Cs. The findings suggest disconnects between HCPs and P/Cs in treatment satisfaction and barriers to new treatments, highlighting the need for improved communication to support patient-centered care. (The education only was supported by an unrestricted educational grant from Regeneron Pharmaceutical, Inc., and Sanofi.).

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Eosinophilic Esophagitis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.