S979 Safety Outcomes of Radiofrequency Ablation for Barrett's Esophagus in Patients With Cirrhosis Versus Non-Cirrhotic Controls: A Propensity-Matched Analysis

Introduction: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a standard treatment for Barrett's esophagus (BE). However, its safety profile and resource utilization in patients with cirrhosis, who may be at higher risk for complications, remains poorly characterized. Methods: Using a large healthcare database, we conducted a propensity score-matched analysis comparing 30-day outcomes between BE patients with cirrhosis (N = 373) and without cirrhosis (N = 373) undergoing RFA. Primary outcomes included post-procedure adverse events and healthcare resource utilization. Results: Baseline characteristics were well-matched between cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic groups, including age (64.8 ± 9.5 years vs 64.7 ± 10.6 years; P = 0.904), gender distribution (25.7% vs 27.6% women; P = 0.562), and comorbidities such as hypertension (70.2% vs 72.4%, P = 0.517) and diabetes (47.2% vs 49.1%; P = 0.608). At 30 days, cirrhotic patients demonstrated significantly higher rates of gastrointestinal bleeding (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 3.997; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.957-8.164; P < 0.0001) and need for repeat endoscopy (aOR 2.536; 95% CI 1.274-5.05; P = 0.006). Healthcare utilization was also increased in the cirrhotic group, with higher rates of emergency department presentations (aOR 1.898; 95% CI 1.032-3.493; P = 0.0367) and hospitalizations (aOR 2.585; 95% CI 1.535-4.351; P = 0.0002). However, there were no significant differences in blood transfusion requirements (aOR 1.0; 95% CI 0.411-2.432; P = 1.0) or intensive care utilization (aOR 1.311; 95% CI 0.567-3.028; P = 0.5252). Conclusion: Patients with cirrhosis undergoing RFA for BE experience significantly higher rates of gastrointestinal bleeding and healthcare utilization compared to non-cirrhotic patients. These findings suggest the need for enhanced risk stratification and post-procedure monitoring protocols specific to the cirrhotic population undergoing RFA.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001131376.94083.b6
Primary Topic
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S979 Safety Outcomes of Radiofrequency Ablation for Barrett's Esophagus in Patients With Cirrhosis Versus Non-Cirrhotic Controls: A Propensity-Matched Analysis

Abhishek Patel, Evelyn Inga, Gulshan Parasher, Archish Kataria et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
article

S979 Safety Outcomes of Radiofrequency Ablation for Barrett's Esophagus in Patients With Cirrhosis Versus Non-Cirrhotic Controls: A Propensity-Matched Analysis

Abhishek Patel, Evelyn Inga, Gulshan Parasher, Archish Kataria, Ahmed Eltelbany, Pooja Viswanath
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a standard treatment for Barrett's esophagus (BE). However, its safety profile and resource utilization in patients with cirrhosis, who may be at higher risk for complications, remains poorly characterized. Methods: Using a large healthcare database, we conducted a propensity score-matched analysis comparing 30-day outcomes between BE patients with cirrhosis (N = 373) and without cirrhosis (N = 373) undergoing RFA. Primary outcomes included post-procedure adverse events and healthcare resource utilization. Results: Baseline characteristics were well-matched between cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic groups, including age (64.8 ± 9.5 years vs 64.7 ± 10.6 years; P = 0.904), gender distribution (25.7% vs 27.6% women; P = 0.562), and comorbidities such as hypertension (70.2% vs 72.4%, P = 0.517) and diabetes (47.2% vs 49.1%; P = 0.608). At 30 days, cirrhotic patients demonstrated significantly higher rates of gastrointestinal bleeding (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 3.997; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.957-8.164; P < 0.0001) and need for repeat endoscopy (aOR 2.536; 95% CI 1.274-5.05; P = 0.006). Healthcare utilization was also increased in the cirrhotic group, with higher rates of emergency department presentations (aOR 1.898; 95% CI 1.032-3.493; P = 0.0367) and hospitalizations (aOR 2.585; 95% CI 1.535-4.351; P = 0.0002). However, there were no significant differences in blood transfusion requirements (aOR 1.0; 95% CI 0.411-2.432; P = 1.0) or intensive care utilization (aOR 1.311; 95% CI 0.567-3.028; P = 0.5252). Conclusion: Patients with cirrhosis undergoing RFA for BE experience significantly higher rates of gastrointestinal bleeding and healthcare utilization compared to non-cirrhotic patients. These findings suggest the need for enhanced risk stratification and post-procedure monitoring protocols specific to the cirrhotic population undergoing RFA.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.