S1089 Prevalence and Prescription Patterns of IBS Treatments Across Demographic and Socioeconomic Factors

Introduction: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common disorder of gut-brain interaction with diverse clinical features and management strategies. We aimed to evaluate treatment patterns for IBS and investigate demographic and socioeconomic disparities in management. Methods: We used data from the All of Us Research Program, a large, diverse cohort launched by the National Institutes of Health in 2018. Medication data included United States Food and Drug Administration-approved drugs for IBS, common off-label treatments (antispasmodics, antidepressants), and over-the-counter agents (fiber, osmotic/stimulant laxatives). Patients were stratified by age, sex, race, ethnicity, income, education, and insurance status. Chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests were used for categorical comparisons using R. Results: Among 390,202 individuals in the database, 3.9% (n = 14,897) were diagnosed with IBS. The majority (57%) were diagnosed between 36 and 65 years of age, were White (73%) and female (78%). The most commonly used medications for IBS-C were osmotic laxatives (18%), stimulant laxatives (9%), and fiber (6%). Prescription IBS-C drugs were used in only 2%. The most commonly prescribed IBS-D medication was loperamide (4%), with prescription IBS-D drugs also used in only 2%. For all IBS subtypes, antispasmodics (9%) and antidepressants (14%) were the most prescribed. Patients diagnosed at an earlier age were more likely to receive medications. Females were more likely to be prescribed antispasmodics (10% vs 7%) and antidepressants (15% vs 10%) than males. Black patients were more likely to be prescribed stimulant laxatives, particularly bisacodyl (10% vs 4% in White and 2% in Asian patients). Asian patients were less likely to receive antidepressants (6% vs 13% in Black and 15% in White patients). Hispanic patients were less likely to be prescribed antispasmodics (6% vs 10%) or antidepressants (11% vs 15%) than non-Hispanic patients. Uninsured patients were less likely to receive osmotic laxatives (11% vs 18%), stimulant laxatives (5% vs 9%), and antidepressants (7% vs 14%). Conclusion: Our findings reveal notable variations in treatment patterns across race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic groups. Females were more frequently prescribed antispasmodics and antidepressants. Asian patients tended to use fewer IBS medications compared to their White and Black counterparts. These disparities highlight the need for further investigation into contributing factors, including differences in disease severity, access to care, and provider treatment preferences.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001131816.39967.c2
Primary Topic
Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S1089 Prevalence and Prescription Patterns of IBS Treatments Across Demographic and Socioeconomic Factors

Judy Nee, Madison L. Simons, Anthony J Lembo, Scott Gabbard et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
article

S1089 Prevalence and Prescription Patterns of IBS Treatments Across Demographic and Socioeconomic Factors

Judy Nee, Madison L. Simons, Anthony J Lembo, Scott Gabbard, Anthony Kerbage, Samita Garg, Y.Y. WU
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common disorder of gut-brain interaction with diverse clinical features and management strategies. We aimed to evaluate treatment patterns for IBS and investigate demographic and socioeconomic disparities in management. Methods: We used data from the All of Us Research Program, a large, diverse cohort launched by the National Institutes of Health in 2018. Medication data included United States Food and Drug Administration-approved drugs for IBS, common off-label treatments (antispasmodics, antidepressants), and over-the-counter agents (fiber, osmotic/stimulant laxatives). Patients were stratified by age, sex, race, ethnicity, income, education, and insurance status. Chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests were used for categorical comparisons using R. Results: Among 390,202 individuals in the database, 3.9% (n = 14,897) were diagnosed with IBS. The majority (57%) were diagnosed between 36 and 65 years of age, were White (73%) and female (78%). The most commonly used medications for IBS-C were osmotic laxatives (18%), stimulant laxatives (9%), and fiber (6%). Prescription IBS-C drugs were used in only 2%. The most commonly prescribed IBS-D medication was loperamide (4%), with prescription IBS-D drugs also used in only 2%. For all IBS subtypes, antispasmodics (9%) and antidepressants (14%) were the most prescribed. Patients diagnosed at an earlier age were more likely to receive medications. Females were more likely to be prescribed antispasmodics (10% vs 7%) and antidepressants (15% vs 10%) than males. Black patients were more likely to be prescribed stimulant laxatives, particularly bisacodyl (10% vs 4% in White and 2% in Asian patients). Asian patients were less likely to receive antidepressants (6% vs 13% in Black and 15% in White patients). Hispanic patients were less likely to be prescribed antispasmodics (6% vs 10%) or antidepressants (11% vs 15%) than non-Hispanic patients. Uninsured patients were less likely to receive osmotic laxatives (11% vs 18%), stimulant laxatives (5% vs 9%), and antidepressants (7% vs 14%). Conclusion: Our findings reveal notable variations in treatment patterns across race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic groups. Females were more frequently prescribed antispasmodics and antidepressants. Asian patients tended to use fewer IBS medications compared to their White and Black counterparts. These disparities highlight the need for further investigation into contributing factors, including differences in disease severity, access to care, and provider treatment preferences.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.