S1006 Barrett’s Esophagus Risk in Patient With Metabolic Syndrome and Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

Introduction: Metabolic syndrome (MetS) has emerged as a significant contributor to gastrointestinal disease, with growing evidence linking its components, particularly central obesity, to gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). It has been suggested that MetS may influence the development of Barrett's esophagus (BE) through additional, reflux-independent mechanisms. This study aims to examine whether patients with MetS and GERD are at an increased risk for the development of BE. Methods: This retrospective cohort study utilized the TriNetX Analytics Platform to analyze patients aged ≥18 years between 2015 and 2024. Patients were stratified into 2 cohorts: those with MetS and GERD, and those with GERD alone. The primary outcome was the diagnosis of BE. Relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using TriNetX’s build-in “Measures of Association” function, with statistical significance determined by P-values. Baseline characteristics were compared using t tests and Chi-square tests, with standardized mean differences (SMDs) used to assess balance. Race, sex, and smoking history were evaluated as potential confounders, but only age at index required adjustment via matching. Results: The analysis included a total of 12,432,503 patients, with 3,378,270 having MetS and GERD, and 9,054,233 with GERD alone. Among patients diagnosed with BE, those in the MetS and GERD group were slightly older (mean current age: 70.1 ± 11.5 years vs 69.8 ± 11.6 years, SMD = 0.0235), and more likely to have a history of smoking (14% vs 11%), although the SMD was below the threshold for matching (SMD = 0.0865). Patients with MetS and GERD exhibited a significantly higher incidence of BE (RR: 1.34; P < 0.0001). Despite this, it took longer for patients with GERD and MetS to be diagnosed with BE (594 days vs 496 days). Conclusion: Patients with MetS and GERD have a significantly increased risk of developing BE compared to those with GERD alone. Additionally, patients with MetS and GERD tend to take longer to be diagnosed with BE. This may be linked to the fact that patients with MetS often have other comorbidities, such as cardiovascular disease or diabetes, which may divert clinical focus away from the timely diagnosis of BE.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001131484.18737.94
Primary Topic
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S1006 Barrett’s Esophagus Risk in Patient With Metabolic Syndrome and Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

Julton Tomanguillo, Anum Khakwani, Nisar A. Amin, Ebubekir Daglilar et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
article

S1006 Barrett’s Esophagus Risk in Patient With Metabolic Syndrome and Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

Julton Tomanguillo, Anum Khakwani, Nisar A. Amin, Ebubekir Daglilar, Harleen Chela, Jennifer Collins
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Metabolic syndrome (MetS) has emerged as a significant contributor to gastrointestinal disease, with growing evidence linking its components, particularly central obesity, to gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). It has been suggested that MetS may influence the development of Barrett's esophagus (BE) through additional, reflux-independent mechanisms. This study aims to examine whether patients with MetS and GERD are at an increased risk for the development of BE. Methods: This retrospective cohort study utilized the TriNetX Analytics Platform to analyze patients aged ≥18 years between 2015 and 2024. Patients were stratified into 2 cohorts: those with MetS and GERD, and those with GERD alone. The primary outcome was the diagnosis of BE. Relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using TriNetX’s build-in “Measures of Association” function, with statistical significance determined by P-values. Baseline characteristics were compared using t tests and Chi-square tests, with standardized mean differences (SMDs) used to assess balance. Race, sex, and smoking history were evaluated as potential confounders, but only age at index required adjustment via matching. Results: The analysis included a total of 12,432,503 patients, with 3,378,270 having MetS and GERD, and 9,054,233 with GERD alone. Among patients diagnosed with BE, those in the MetS and GERD group were slightly older (mean current age: 70.1 ± 11.5 years vs 69.8 ± 11.6 years, SMD = 0.0235), and more likely to have a history of smoking (14% vs 11%), although the SMD was below the threshold for matching (SMD = 0.0865). Patients with MetS and GERD exhibited a significantly higher incidence of BE (RR: 1.34; P < 0.0001). Despite this, it took longer for patients with GERD and MetS to be diagnosed with BE (594 days vs 496 days). Conclusion: Patients with MetS and GERD have a significantly increased risk of developing BE compared to those with GERD alone. Additionally, patients with MetS and GERD tend to take longer to be diagnosed with BE. This may be linked to the fact that patients with MetS often have other comorbidities, such as cardiovascular disease or diabetes, which may divert clinical focus away from the timely diagnosis of BE.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.