S4350 Boneless but Not Harmless: Endoscopic Closure of Steak-Induced Upper Esophageal Perforation

Introduction: Esophageal perforation (EP) is a life-threatening crisis with mortality rates reaching up to 50%. Most cases are iatrogenic, while other etiologies include spontaneous rupture and caustic ingestion. Among foreign body-related injuries, fish bones are most common, accounting for around 12% of cases. Perforations due to boneless food is exceedingly uncommon. Upper EPs pose a distinct challenge for endoscopic stent placement due to the close proximity to the upper esophageal sphincter, increased risk of stent migration, and patient intolerance. Therefore, alternative minimally invasive strategies are crucial - particularly for stable patients with contained perforations where conventional stenting is not viable. Case Description/Methods: A 43-year-old man with type 2 diabetes and no smoking history presented with dysphagia and burning chest pain after eating steak, which briefly felt stuck in his throat before passing. He initially tolerated solids but his symptoms worsened over 3 days, progressing to liquid-only diet. Computed tomography imaging of neck revealed a 5.8 cm retropharyngeal collection just distal to the upper esophageal sphincter, showing mixed fluid and soft tissue components with local esophageal deviation. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy demonstrated a 3 cm non-bleeding, contained upper EP located 19-22 cm from incisors, with yellow debris but no pus. A pediatric gastroscope was utilized to evaluate and irrigate the cavity with a gentamicin-water solution. PuraStat® was then applied to promote mucosal healing. To approximate the edges of the defect, 8 hemostatic clips were deployed. A post-procedure Gastrografin® esophagram showed no evidence of leakage, and the patient’s diet was gradually advanced. Discussion: Upper EP presents significant technical limitations for conventional stent placement due to anatomical constraints. This case illustrates that even boneless foods, if swallowed with sufficient force, can cause perforation. It also highlights the viability of a minimally invasive endoscopic approach utilizing PuraStat® and hemostatic clips. PuraStat®, a self-assembling peptide gel traditionally used for hemostasis, shows promise in promoting mucosal healing and tissue granulation. Furthermore, a pediatric gastroscope was used to distinguish between a mediastinal leak and a contained perforation. This successful case reinforces the evolving role of minimally invasive endoscopic techniques in managing upper EPs, offering an effective alternative to surgery in select patients.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001144860.95515.49
Primary Topic
Foreign Body Medical Cases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S4350 Boneless but Not Harmless: Endoscopic Closure of Steak-Induced Upper Esophageal Perforation

Sindhura Kolli, Genanew Bedanie, Tasur Seen, Bibhuti Adhikari et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Foreign Body Medical Cases
article

S4350 Boneless but Not Harmless: Endoscopic Closure of Steak-Induced Upper Esophageal Perforation

Sindhura Kolli, Genanew Bedanie, Tasur Seen, Bibhuti Adhikari, Woo Suk Kim, Krishna Gurram, Nirali Sheth
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Esophageal perforation (EP) is a life-threatening crisis with mortality rates reaching up to 50%. Most cases are iatrogenic, while other etiologies include spontaneous rupture and caustic ingestion. Among foreign body-related injuries, fish bones are most common, accounting for around 12% of cases. Perforations due to boneless food is exceedingly uncommon. Upper EPs pose a distinct challenge for endoscopic stent placement due to the close proximity to the upper esophageal sphincter, increased risk of stent migration, and patient intolerance. Therefore, alternative minimally invasive strategies are crucial - particularly for stable patients with contained perforations where conventional stenting is not viable. Case Description/Methods: A 43-year-old man with type 2 diabetes and no smoking history presented with dysphagia and burning chest pain after eating steak, which briefly felt stuck in his throat before passing. He initially tolerated solids but his symptoms worsened over 3 days, progressing to liquid-only diet. Computed tomography imaging of neck revealed a 5.8 cm retropharyngeal collection just distal to the upper esophageal sphincter, showing mixed fluid and soft tissue components with local esophageal deviation. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy demonstrated a 3 cm non-bleeding, contained upper EP located 19-22 cm from incisors, with yellow debris but no pus. A pediatric gastroscope was utilized to evaluate and irrigate the cavity with a gentamicin-water solution. PuraStat® was then applied to promote mucosal healing. To approximate the edges of the defect, 8 hemostatic clips were deployed. A post-procedure Gastrografin® esophagram showed no evidence of leakage, and the patient’s diet was gradually advanced. Discussion: Upper EP presents significant technical limitations for conventional stent placement due to anatomical constraints. This case illustrates that even boneless foods, if swallowed with sufficient force, can cause perforation. It also highlights the viability of a minimally invasive endoscopic approach utilizing PuraStat® and hemostatic clips. PuraStat®, a self-assembling peptide gel traditionally used for hemostasis, shows promise in promoting mucosal healing and tissue granulation. Furthermore, a pediatric gastroscope was used to distinguish between a mediastinal leak and a contained perforation. This successful case reinforces the evolving role of minimally invasive endoscopic techniques in managing upper EPs, offering an effective alternative to surgery in select patients.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Foreign Body Medical Cases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.