Intelligent‑TPACK in practice: design and evidence from a three‑week teacher preparation module

Rapid advances in generative AI sharpen the need for teachers to develop pedagogical and ethical capacities for AI‑integrated instruction. While Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) provides a valuable framework for technology integration, it does not fully capture AI’s unique complexities. This study presents an integrated i‑TPACK approach that extends Intelligent‑TPACK by adding AI‑as‑content (i‑CK) and AI‑for‑professional development (i‑PD) and by threading a five‑stage AI‑literacy progression (Know→ Use→ Evaluate→ Ethics→ Create) within each domain, treating ethics as distributed and iterative. We designed and examined a three-week professional development module for preservice teachers using a convergent mixed-methods design. Pre–post surveys ( n = 25 matched pairs) with a six‑subscale Integrated i‑TPACK instrument showed statistically significant gains across all domains (Wilcoxon, Holm‑adjusted; medium‑to‑large effects). Qualitative analyses of lesson artifacts, decision logs, reflections, and micro-teaching documented instances of layered ethical decision-making (privacy/data governance, bias/fairness, transparency/provenance/accountability), progression along the AI literacy stages, and discipline-aligned pedagogical designs. Embedding an ethical decision‑making checkpoint across performance‑based activities made ethics visible in teacher work and coincided with more explicit safeguards and verification steps in lesson artifacts and micro‑teaching within the module. By detailing this empirically grounded model, our study offers theoretical and practical insights for teacher educators seeking to cultivate principled GenAI-supported instruction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computers and Education Open
Published
2025-11-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2025.100306
Primary Topic
Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intelligent‑TPACK in practice: design and evidence from a three‑week teacher preparation module

Patricia Grant, Trina J. Davis, Noelle Wall Sweany, Ali Biçer et al.
Computers and Education Open
Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
article

Intelligent‑TPACK in practice: design and evidence from a three‑week teacher preparation module

Patricia Grant, Trina J. Davis, Noelle Wall Sweany, Ali Biçer, Tugce Aldemir, Selçuk Kılınç
article en

Abstract

Rapid advances in generative AI sharpen the need for teachers to develop pedagogical and ethical capacities for AI‑integrated instruction. While Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) provides a valuable framework for technology integration, it does not fully capture AI’s unique complexities. This study presents an integrated i‑TPACK approach that extends Intelligent‑TPACK by adding AI‑as‑content (i‑CK) and AI‑for‑professional development (i‑PD) and by threading a five‑stage AI‑literacy progression (Know→ Use→ Evaluate→ Ethics→ Create) within each domain, treating ethics as distributed and iterative. We designed and examined a three-week professional development module for preservice teachers using a convergent mixed-methods design. Pre–post surveys ( n = 25 matched pairs) with a six‑subscale Integrated i‑TPACK instrument showed statistically significant gains across all domains (Wilcoxon, Holm‑adjusted; medium‑to‑large effects). Qualitative analyses of lesson artifacts, decision logs, reflections, and micro-teaching documented instances of layered ethical decision-making (privacy/data governance, bias/fairness, transparency/provenance/accountability), progression along the AI literacy stages, and discipline-aligned pedagogical designs. Embedding an ethical decision‑making checkpoint across performance‑based activities made ethics visible in teacher work and coincided with more explicit safeguards and verification steps in lesson artifacts and micro‑teaching within the module. By detailing this empirically grounded model, our study offers theoretical and practical insights for teacher educators seeking to cultivate principled GenAI-supported instruction.

Computers and Education OpenVol. 9
Middle East Technical University (TR), Texas A&M University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.