Goal setting for difficult to measure goals: the FIRST method

Purpose The current study presents a new methodology for goal setting that addresses the limitation of the SMART method that many personal development goals are difficult to measure. This method provides a process, format and specific form that is applicable at all levels within an organization. Design/methodology/approach 27 employees (with their managers) across 5 organizations and 10 leaders (with their executive coach) across 6 organizations utilized this method. Feedback was obtained via interviews and surveys from these individuals to determine practicality and results obtained for goal setting using the FIRST method for personal development goals. Findings The findings provide positive feedback on this process from managers, coaches and employees. Individuals noted greater clarity on goals and specific actions for goal achievement along with receiving more feedback. Managers and coaches reported more in-depth conversations around behavioral changes as well as greater goal achievement and overall job performance. Research limitations/implications The FIRST Method extends Goal-Setting Theory and offers a complementary approach to the SMART Method. Research findings are preliminary and should be examined with a larger sample size over a longer period of time. Practical implications The FIRST method provides a specific process to create actionable personal development goals that allow employees and managers to communicate effectively, create plans of action, hold each other accountable and maintain progress. Originality/value The FIRST method for goal setting is a new method that has not yet been introduced to the research literature.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Development in Learning Organizations An International Journal
Published
2025-11-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/dlo-04-2025-0145
Primary Topic
Ego Development and Educational Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Goal setting for difficult to measure goals: the FIRST method

Jenell Lynn-Senter Wittmer
Development in Learning Organizations An International Journal
Ego Development and Educational Practices
article

Goal setting for difficult to measure goals: the FIRST method

Jenell Lynn-Senter Wittmer
article en

Abstract

Purpose The current study presents a new methodology for goal setting that addresses the limitation of the SMART method that many personal development goals are difficult to measure. This method provides a process, format and specific form that is applicable at all levels within an organization. Design/methodology/approach 27 employees (with their managers) across 5 organizations and 10 leaders (with their executive coach) across 6 organizations utilized this method. Feedback was obtained via interviews and surveys from these individuals to determine practicality and results obtained for goal setting using the FIRST method for personal development goals. Findings The findings provide positive feedback on this process from managers, coaches and employees. Individuals noted greater clarity on goals and specific actions for goal achievement along with receiving more feedback. Managers and coaches reported more in-depth conversations around behavioral changes as well as greater goal achievement and overall job performance. Research limitations/implications The FIRST Method extends Goal-Setting Theory and offers a complementary approach to the SMART Method. Research findings are preliminary and should be examined with a larger sample size over a longer period of time. Practical implications The FIRST method provides a specific process to create actionable personal development goals that allow employees and managers to communicate effectively, create plans of action, hold each other accountable and maintain progress. Originality/value The FIRST method for goal setting is a new method that has not yet been introduced to the research literature.

Development in Learning Organizations An International Journal
University of Toledo (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Ego Development and Educational Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.