Customer value extraction vs. co-creation at self-service checkout

Purpose Self-service checkout systems (SCSs) receive mixed customer evaluations – some see them as convenient, others as unpaid labour. Although these divergent value perceptions can drive customer satisfaction or dissatisfaction, prior research has not examined customer satisfaction with SCSs through the lens of value perception, particularly in relation to the distinction between value co-creation and value extraction. This study aims to address that gap. Design/methodology/approach This research used two scenario-based, between-subjects online experiments, with data gathered via an online research panel. To test the hypotheses, the data were analysed using ANOVA and the PROCESS macro. Findings The results reveal that a high cognitive workload elicits a sense of value extraction, whereas a low cognitive workload elicits value co-creation. Additionally, experiencing a high cognitive workload under intense time pressure can evoke a higher sense of value extraction. Value extraction is a potent mediator that explains the effects of cognitive workload and time pressure on customer satisfaction. Originality/value This study advances the understanding of customer satisfaction with self-service checkout systems (SCSs) by conceptualising value perception as both co-creation and extraction, shaped by key situational and cognitive factors during the self-checkout process. The findings offer strategic insights for effectively implementing SCSs in-store to enhance customer satisfaction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences
Published
2025-11-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ijqss-07-2025-0173
Primary Topic
Service and Product Innovation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Customer value extraction vs. co-creation at self-service checkout

Dewi Tojib, Mathieu Lajante, Mariam Hamam
International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences
Service and Product Innovation
article

Customer value extraction vs. co-creation at self-service checkout

Dewi Tojib, Mathieu Lajante, Mariam Hamam
article en

Abstract

Purpose Self-service checkout systems (SCSs) receive mixed customer evaluations – some see them as convenient, others as unpaid labour. Although these divergent value perceptions can drive customer satisfaction or dissatisfaction, prior research has not examined customer satisfaction with SCSs through the lens of value perception, particularly in relation to the distinction between value co-creation and value extraction. This study aims to address that gap. Design/methodology/approach This research used two scenario-based, between-subjects online experiments, with data gathered via an online research panel. To test the hypotheses, the data were analysed using ANOVA and the PROCESS macro. Findings The results reveal that a high cognitive workload elicits a sense of value extraction, whereas a low cognitive workload elicits value co-creation. Additionally, experiencing a high cognitive workload under intense time pressure can evoke a higher sense of value extraction. Value extraction is a potent mediator that explains the effects of cognitive workload and time pressure on customer satisfaction. Originality/value This study advances the understanding of customer satisfaction with self-service checkout systems (SCSs) by conceptualising value perception as both co-creation and extraction, shaped by key situational and cognitive factors during the self-checkout process. The findings offer strategic insights for effectively implementing SCSs in-store to enhance customer satisfaction.

International Journal of Quality and Service SciencesVol. 17(4)
Ted Rogers Centre for Heart Research (CA), Monash University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Service and Product Innovation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.