Risk Analysis Index as a Predictor of Mortality and Failure to Rescue in Patients Undergoing Distal Femur Fracture Fixation

Abstract Purpose This study sought to evaluate the use of frailty, compared to age alone and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, for prediction of mortality and failure to rescue (FTR) in patients undergoing surgical fixation of distal femur fractures (DFFs). Methods The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database was queried for patients who underwent surgical management of DFFs. Frailty was evaluated using the 5-Item Modified Frailty Index (mFI-5) and Risk Analysis Index (RAI). Outcomes included 30-day mortality and FTR (mortality following major complication). Multivariate regression and receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) analyses were performed to assess odds ratio (OR) and discriminatory accuracy (quantified by C-statistic), respectively. Results There were 2638 patients (median age 73 years) undergoing DFF fixation included in this study. Of these, 90 (3.4%) patients experienced mortality, while FTR occurred in 51 (1.9%) patients. Increasing frailty, as rated by the mFI-5 and RAI, was significantly associated with higher odds of 30-day mortality and FTR in patients undergoing surgical fixation of DFF. Additionally, RAI showed superior discriminatory accuracy for 30-day mortality and FTR compared to mFI-5, age, and ASA. Conclusions The RAI demonstrates superior predictive value and discriminatory accuracy for postoperative mortality. Given these findings, frailty as measured by the RAI may be a useful bedside screening tool to identify patients at risk for adverse outcomes. In doing so, patients can be optimized preoperatively to improve clinical care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Indian Journal of Orthopaedics
Published
2025-11-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-025-01610-3
Primary Topic
Hip and Femur Fractures
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Risk Analysis Index as a Predictor of Mortality and Failure to Rescue in Patients Undergoing Distal Femur Fracture Fixation

Jared Sasaki, James D. Miller, Victor Koltenyuk, Hursch Patel et al.
Indian Journal of Orthopaedics
Hip and Femur Fractures
article

Risk Analysis Index as a Predictor of Mortality and Failure to Rescue in Patients Undergoing Distal Femur Fracture Fixation

Jared Sasaki, James D. Miller, Victor Koltenyuk, Hursch Patel, Nithin K. Gupta, Kush Modi, Omar I. Sbaih
article en

Abstract

Abstract Purpose This study sought to evaluate the use of frailty, compared to age alone and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, for prediction of mortality and failure to rescue (FTR) in patients undergoing surgical fixation of distal femur fractures (DFFs). Methods The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database was queried for patients who underwent surgical management of DFFs. Frailty was evaluated using the 5-Item Modified Frailty Index (mFI-5) and Risk Analysis Index (RAI). Outcomes included 30-day mortality and FTR (mortality following major complication). Multivariate regression and receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) analyses were performed to assess odds ratio (OR) and discriminatory accuracy (quantified by C-statistic), respectively. Results There were 2638 patients (median age 73 years) undergoing DFF fixation included in this study. Of these, 90 (3.4%) patients experienced mortality, while FTR occurred in 51 (1.9%) patients. Increasing frailty, as rated by the mFI-5 and RAI, was significantly associated with higher odds of 30-day mortality and FTR in patients undergoing surgical fixation of DFF. Additionally, RAI showed superior discriminatory accuracy for 30-day mortality and FTR compared to mFI-5, age, and ASA. Conclusions The RAI demonstrates superior predictive value and discriminatory accuracy for postoperative mortality. Given these findings, frailty as measured by the RAI may be a useful bedside screening tool to identify patients at risk for adverse outcomes. In doing so, patients can be optimized preoperatively to improve clinical care.

Indian Journal of Orthopaedics
OhioHealth (US), New York Medical College (US), Georgetown University (US), Thomas Jefferson University Hospital (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Hip and Femur Fractures
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.