Political rhetorical force: analyzing the dynamics of threat in President Biden’s speeches

This study investigates the strategic use of threatening language in President Joe Biden’s speeches, introducing the concept of ‘diplomatic impoliteness’. This rhetorical style combines coercive language with institutional legitimacy, transcending the traditional binary of polite diplomacy and aggressive populism. Applying Muschalik’s framework, we conducted a qualitative analysis of 13 key speeches from 2021 to 2022, examining linguistic features such as conditionality, futurity, and violent verbs. The findings reveal a nuanced reliance on indirect threats, primarily realized through markers of conditionality and futurity, which project power while maintaining a diplomatic frame. Consequently, this research contributes to the field of political discourse and pragmatics by reframing the interplay between language, power and impoliteness in liberal democratic leadership.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cogent Social Sciences
Published
2025-11-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2025.2582839
Primary Topic
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Political rhetorical force: analyzing the dynamics of threat in President Biden’s speeches

Sharif M. Alghazo, Noureddine Derki, Ghaleb Ahmed Rabab'ah, Otmane Abdelkader Drissi
Cogent Social Sciences
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
article

Political rhetorical force: analyzing the dynamics of threat in President Biden’s speeches

Sharif M. Alghazo, Noureddine Derki, Ghaleb Ahmed Rabab'ah, Otmane Abdelkader Drissi
article en

Abstract

This study investigates the strategic use of threatening language in President Joe Biden’s speeches, introducing the concept of ‘diplomatic impoliteness’. This rhetorical style combines coercive language with institutional legitimacy, transcending the traditional binary of polite diplomacy and aggressive populism. Applying Muschalik’s framework, we conducted a qualitative analysis of 13 key speeches from 2021 to 2022, examining linguistic features such as conditionality, futurity, and violent verbs. The findings reveal a nuanced reliance on indirect threats, primarily realized through markers of conditionality and futurity, which project power while maintaining a diplomatic frame. Consequently, this research contributes to the field of political discourse and pragmatics by reframing the interplay between language, power and impoliteness in liberal democratic leadership.

Cogent Social SciencesVol. 11(1)
University of Jordan (JO), Université Mustapha Stambouli de Mascara (DZ), Engineering Arts (United States) (US), Université de Saida Dr.Moulay Tahar (DZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.