Divergent Mechanisms in Iridium/Rhodium‐Catalyzed Carbene Generation from Sulfoxonium Ylides: A Density Functional Theory Study
A computational study has been performed to investigate the mechanisms of both the iridium-catalyzed amidocarbonylation of olefins and the CH bond activation using sulfoxonium ylide as a carbene precursor. For the iridium-catalyzed amidocarbonylation of olefins, the optimal mechanism involves deprotonation, migratory insertion of the olefin, carbenation, carbene insertion, and protonation, with protonation identified as the rate-determining step. Conversely, Ir-catalyzed CH activation proceeds through CH bond activation, carbenation, carbene insertion, and protonation, where CH bond activation constitutes the rate-determining step. Computational result further reveals that Rh-catalyzed amidocarbonylation of olefins exhibits a higher activation barrier (25.7 kcal mol<sup>-1</sup>), with carbenation as the rate-limiting step, sharply contrasting with the iridium-catalyzed system. The second-order perturbation theory analysis (SOPT) reveals significant charge delocalization between lone-pair electrons, bonding (BD), and antibonding (BD*) orbitals. This electronic delocalization rationalizes the observed energy disparities during Ir- versus Rh-carbene formation. Supporting this, natural bond orbital charge analysis of carbenation transition states confirms a lower activation barrier for Ir-carbene formation compared to Rh-carbene formation.
Authors
- Ruopeng Bai (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1097-8526)
- Yuanxue Yi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5367-4808)
- Xiaoling Luo
- Yi Zeng (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8761-9719)
- Chunhui Shan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0006-6870-7135)
Institutions
- Chongqing Normal University (CN)
- Chongqing University (CN)
- Chongqing Medical University (CN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- ChemPhysChem
- Published
- 2025-11-08
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1002/cphc.202500566
- Primary Topic
- Cyclopropane Reaction Mechanisms
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00