The relationship between dose, concentration and toxicity of everolimus in the treatment of neuroendocrine tumors: A prospective observational study

Everolimus is used in the treatment of patients with advanced neuroendocrine tumors (NET) and is administered at fixed doses despite known interpatient pharmacokinetic variability. This may affect both efficacy and tolerability. We wanted to investigate the relationship between prescribed dose, blood trough concentrations (C<sub>trough</sub>), and toxicity in NET patients receiving everolimus in routine clinical practice. In this prospective observational study NET patients were treated with everolimus, mostly as third- or fourth-line therapy. Dose was adjusted according to adverse effects and tumor response. Concentrations (C<sub>trough</sub>) of everolimus were measured at each routine follow-up and correlated to dose and cumulative adverse event (cAE) scores. Associations were evaluated using linear and generalized linear mixed models which accounted for repeated measurements within patients and varying dose regimens over time. Thirty-six patients were included. Everolimus dose was a significant predictor of C<sub>trough</sub> (p < .001), but considerable interindividual variability was observed. Median C<sub>trough</sub> levels increased with dose: 3.9, 5.1, 7.4, and 16.4 ng/mL for 2.5, 5.0, 7.5, and 10.0 mg per day, respectively. Considerable overlap in blood concentration was observed across dose groups; patients receiving 2.5 mg reached levels as high as 8.6 ng/mL, while those on 5 mg exhibited a wide range from 1.1 to 21.2 ng/mL. C<sub>trough</sub> ≥ 6.0 ng/mL was associated with increased toxicity (p = .03), whereas nominal dose was not a reliable independent predictor of adverse events. Although median blood concentrations increased with higher doses, there was considerable variation between patients, resulting in overlapping concentration ranges across all dose groups. This indicates that fixed-dose regimens may not reliably predict systemic drug exposure. Everolimus blood concentrations were superior to dose levels in predicting adverse events. Therapeutic drug monitoring and individualized dose adjustment may improve the balance between efficacy and toxicity in NET patients treated with everolimus.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Neuroendocrinology
Published
2025-11-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jne.70107
Primary Topic
Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The relationship between dose, concentration and toxicity of everolimus in the treatment of neuroendocrine tumors: A prospective observational study

Kjerstin Skrede Mordal, Espen Thiis‐Evensen, Nils Tore Vethe, Jon Sponheim et al.
Journal of Neuroendocrinology
Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances
article

The relationship between dose, concentration and toxicity of everolimus in the treatment of neuroendocrine tumors: A prospective observational study

Kjerstin Skrede Mordal, Espen Thiis‐Evensen, Nils Tore Vethe, Jon Sponheim, Tone Lise Åvitsland, Oddry Folkestad
article en

Abstract

Everolimus is used in the treatment of patients with advanced neuroendocrine tumors (NET) and is administered at fixed doses despite known interpatient pharmacokinetic variability. This may affect both efficacy and tolerability. We wanted to investigate the relationship between prescribed dose, blood trough concentrations (C<sub>trough</sub>), and toxicity in NET patients receiving everolimus in routine clinical practice. In this prospective observational study NET patients were treated with everolimus, mostly as third- or fourth-line therapy. Dose was adjusted according to adverse effects and tumor response. Concentrations (C<sub>trough</sub>) of everolimus were measured at each routine follow-up and correlated to dose and cumulative adverse event (cAE) scores. Associations were evaluated using linear and generalized linear mixed models which accounted for repeated measurements within patients and varying dose regimens over time. Thirty-six patients were included. Everolimus dose was a significant predictor of C<sub>trough</sub> (p < .001), but considerable interindividual variability was observed. Median C<sub>trough</sub> levels increased with dose: 3.9, 5.1, 7.4, and 16.4 ng/mL for 2.5, 5.0, 7.5, and 10.0 mg per day, respectively. Considerable overlap in blood concentration was observed across dose groups; patients receiving 2.5 mg reached levels as high as 8.6 ng/mL, while those on 5 mg exhibited a wide range from 1.1 to 21.2 ng/mL. C<sub>trough</sub> ≥ 6.0 ng/mL was associated with increased toxicity (p = .03), whereas nominal dose was not a reliable independent predictor of adverse events. Although median blood concentrations increased with higher doses, there was considerable variation between patients, resulting in overlapping concentration ranges across all dose groups. This indicates that fixed-dose regimens may not reliably predict systemic drug exposure. Everolimus blood concentrations were superior to dose levels in predicting adverse events. Therapeutic drug monitoring and individualized dose adjustment may improve the balance between efficacy and toxicity in NET patients treated with everolimus.

Journal of NeuroendocrinologyVol. 38(1)
Oslo University Hospital (NO), University of Oslo (NO), Sykehuset i Vestfold (NO), European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.