Sensing danger: Energetic and hydric costs of chemoreception in a lizard

Abstract Understanding the benefits and costs of chemoreception and predator avoidance is crucial for unravelling the ecological adaptations of potential prey organisms. In squamate reptiles, tongue flicking is a specialized behaviour used to collect chemical cues from the environment for foraging and predator detection. We hypothesized that the behavioural response to predator scents, and notably chemosensory investigation, incurs both energetic and hydric costs. We conducted two complementary experiments in a small, ground‐active lizard ( Zootoca vivipara ) to assess the energetic and water‐based constraints associated with predator detection and response. First, under controlled exposure to predator scents in a flow‐through system, lizards increased tongue‐flicking rates and thereby metabolic rate and total evaporative water loss. Second, in a laboratory manipulation, chronically dehydrated lizards showed reduced tongue‐flick rates and impaired predator scent discrimination. These findings highlight a trade‐off between water balance regulation and chemoreception, with potential implications for prey–predator interactions in terrestrial ecosystems under drought risk. Thus, energy and water constraints may mediate indirect effects of climate change on species interactions and population dynamics through alterations in sensory capacities. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Functional Ecology
Published
2025-11-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.70214
Primary Topic
Amphibian and Reptile Biology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sensing danger: Energetic and hydric costs of chemoreception in a lizard

Jean‐François Le Galliard, Chloé Chabaud, Simon Agostini, Olivier Lourdais
Functional Ecology
Amphibian and Reptile Biology
article

Sensing danger: Energetic and hydric costs of chemoreception in a lizard

Jean‐François Le Galliard, Chloé Chabaud, Simon Agostini, Olivier Lourdais
article en

Abstract

Abstract Understanding the benefits and costs of chemoreception and predator avoidance is crucial for unravelling the ecological adaptations of potential prey organisms. In squamate reptiles, tongue flicking is a specialized behaviour used to collect chemical cues from the environment for foraging and predator detection. We hypothesized that the behavioural response to predator scents, and notably chemosensory investigation, incurs both energetic and hydric costs. We conducted two complementary experiments in a small, ground‐active lizard ( Zootoca vivipara ) to assess the energetic and water‐based constraints associated with predator detection and response. First, under controlled exposure to predator scents in a flow‐through system, lizards increased tongue‐flicking rates and thereby metabolic rate and total evaporative water loss. Second, in a laboratory manipulation, chronically dehydrated lizards showed reduced tongue‐flick rates and impaired predator scent discrimination. These findings highlight a trade‐off between water balance regulation and chemoreception, with potential implications for prey–predator interactions in terrestrial ecosystems under drought risk. Thus, energy and water constraints may mediate indirect effects of climate change on species interactions and population dynamics through alterations in sensory capacities. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

Functional EcologyVol. 39(12)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Université Paris-Est Créteil (FR), Sorbonne Université (FR), Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR), Centre d'Etudes Biologiques de Chizé (FR), Institut d'écologie et des sciences de l'environnement de Paris (FR), Cereep Ecotron Île-de-France (FR), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (FR)
Agence Nationale de la Recherche
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Amphibian and Reptile Biology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.