Hydrogen Bond Benchmark: Focal‐Point Analysis and Assessment of <scp>DFT</scp> Functionals

We performed a hierarchical, convergent ab initio benchmark study and systematically analyzed the performance of density functional approximations for describing hydrogen bonds in small neutral, cationic, and anionic complexes, as well as in larger systems involving amide, urea, deltamide, and squaramide moieties. Focal point analyses (FPA), extrapolating to the ab initio limit, were carried out using correlated wave function methods up to CCSDT(Q) for the small complexes and CCSD(T) for the larger systems, together with correlation-consistent Gaussian basis sets up to the complete basis set limit. Optimized geometries and vibrational frequencies were obtained at the CCSD(T) level. The resulting FPA hydrogen-bond energies converge within a few tenths of a kcal mol<sup>-1</sup>. These reference data were used to evaluate 60 density functionals (including 12 dispersion-corrected), spanning the local-density approximation (LDA), generalized gradient approximations (GGAs), meta-GGAs, hybrids, meta-hybrids, double-hybrids, and range-separated hybrids. Overall, the meta-hybrid M06-2X provides the best performance for both hydrogen bond energies and geometries, while the dispersion-corrected GGAs BLYP-D3(BJ) and BLYP-D4 also yield accurate hydrogen-bond data and can serve as cost-effective options for studying large and complex systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Computational Chemistry
Published
2025-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.70265
Primary Topic
Crystallography and molecular interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hydrogen Bond Benchmark: Focal‐Point Analysis and Assessment of DFT Functionals

Lucas de Azevedo Santos, Erica C. Mitchell, Pascal Vermeeren, F. Matthias Bickelhaupt et al.
Journal of Computational Chemistry
Crystallography and molecular interactions
article

Hydrogen Bond Benchmark: Focal‐Point Analysis and Assessment of DFT Functionals

Lucas de Azevedo Santos, Erica C. Mitchell, Pascal Vermeeren, F. Matthias Bickelhaupt, Célia Fonseca Guerra, Henry F. Schaefer, Mitchell E. Lahm
article en

Abstract

We performed a hierarchical, convergent ab initio benchmark study and systematically analyzed the performance of density functional approximations for describing hydrogen bonds in small neutral, cationic, and anionic complexes, as well as in larger systems involving amide, urea, deltamide, and squaramide moieties. Focal point analyses (FPA), extrapolating to the ab initio limit, were carried out using correlated wave function methods up to CCSDT(Q) for the small complexes and CCSD(T) for the larger systems, together with correlation-consistent Gaussian basis sets up to the complete basis set limit. Optimized geometries and vibrational frequencies were obtained at the CCSD(T) level. The resulting FPA hydrogen-bond energies converge within a few tenths of a kcal mol<sup>-1</sup>. These reference data were used to evaluate 60 density functionals (including 12 dispersion-corrected), spanning the local-density approximation (LDA), generalized gradient approximations (GGAs), meta-GGAs, hybrids, meta-hybrids, double-hybrids, and range-separated hybrids. Overall, the meta-hybrid M06-2X provides the best performance for both hydrogen bond energies and geometries, while the dispersion-corrected GGAs BLYP-D3(BJ) and BLYP-D4 also yield accurate hydrogen-bond data and can serve as cost-effective options for studying large and complex systems.

Journal of Computational ChemistryVol. 46(30)
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), University of Georgia (US), University of Johannesburg (ZA), Radboud University Medical Center (NL), Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences (NL), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
U.S. Department of Energy, Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Crystallography and molecular interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.