The feeling of preference: Metacognitive experiences promoting preference expression

Abstract Building on a review of pertinent literature, we draw attention to preference‐expressive choice — decisions that appear to reveal a well‐established individual preference — and propose that such choices can be shaped by a distinct epistemic metacognitive state: the feeling of preference (FOP). FOP is the perception that one has, or should be able to form, a preference in a given domain, even before encountering specific options and without retrievable prior preferences. Building on research in metacognition, preference fluency, and preference expression, we theorize likely antecedents and consequences of FOP and test its viability in the context of the compromise effect, where having a preference often entails “picking a side” rather than choosing the middle option. Across multiple studies, FOP — situationally triggered by preference‐related cues — reduced compromising and increased preference‐expressive choice, independent of preference retrieval, certainty, or social desirability. Identifying FOP as a distinct driver of choice integrates and extends existing theory on metacognition and decision‐making, and highlights it as a promising, underexplored piece of the puzzle in understanding when, why, and how people feel ready to make bold and self‐expressive choices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Consumer Psychology Review
Published
2025-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/arcp.70003
Primary Topic
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The feeling of preference: Metacognitive experiences promoting preference expression

Aner Sela, Itamar Simonson
Consumer Psychology Review
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
article

The feeling of preference: Metacognitive experiences promoting preference expression

Aner Sela, Itamar Simonson
article en

Abstract

Abstract Building on a review of pertinent literature, we draw attention to preference‐expressive choice — decisions that appear to reveal a well‐established individual preference — and propose that such choices can be shaped by a distinct epistemic metacognitive state: the feeling of preference (FOP). FOP is the perception that one has, or should be able to form, a preference in a given domain, even before encountering specific options and without retrievable prior preferences. Building on research in metacognition, preference fluency, and preference expression, we theorize likely antecedents and consequences of FOP and test its viability in the context of the compromise effect, where having a preference often entails “picking a side” rather than choosing the middle option. Across multiple studies, FOP — situationally triggered by preference‐related cues — reduced compromising and increased preference‐expressive choice, independent of preference retrieval, certainty, or social desirability. Identifying FOP as a distinct driver of choice integrates and extends existing theory on metacognition and decision‐making, and highlights it as a promising, underexplored piece of the puzzle in understanding when, why, and how people feel ready to make bold and self‐expressive choices.

Consumer Psychology ReviewVol. 9(1)
University of Florida (US), Stanford University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The feeling of preference: Metacognitive experiences promoting preference expression — Aner Sela, Itamar Simonson · Consumer Psychology Review (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS