Machine learning enhanced model for predicting coking coal blend performance with low-rank coal additions

• The current study developed a hybrid experimental - computational framework for coal blending. • Coal blending improved fixed carbon from 48.3 wt. % to 58.7 wt. % while reducing volatile matter to 28.9 wt. %. • Metallurgical blends achieved superior coke quality with CSR values of 66.0 - 69.8 and CRI values of 17.8 - 21.4. • Gieseler fluidity improved from 12 - 50 ddpm to 377 - 686 ddpm in metallurgical blends. • Random Forest regression outperformed traditional models achieving R² up to 0.97 with mean absolute errors as low as 0.05 wt. % for sulfur prediction. Achieving blast-furnace coke specifications while increasing the proportion of low-rank coals remains a key challenge for iron and steel producers. The current study addresses this challenge by integrating pilot plant-scale blending trials with multiscale characterization and machine learning to predict coke quality from coal blend properties. Ten blends from South African and imported coals were characterizedvia proximate/ultimate analyses, Gieseler rheology, ash chemistry, and standard coke tests. Transitioning from market-type blends (1 - 5) to metallurgical blends (6 - 10) lowered ash from approximately 14.6 - 15.4 wt.% to 11.8 - 12.6 wt.% and positioned the coke firmly within the metallurgical performance window (CRI ≈18–21, CSR ≈66–70, M40 ≈59–62, M10 ≈4.9–5.5). Additivity was observed for several coal parameters (e.g., ash, selected rheology measures), whereas sulfur content and volatile matter behaved non-linearly. Against linear and quadratic baselines, a validated Random Forest (RF) regressor most accurately mapped coal blend properties to coke quality, achieving R²≈0.97 for ash, 0.91 for sulfur content, and 0.93 for volatile -matter (test-set MAE ≈0.45 wt.%, 0.05 wt.%, and 1.50 wt.% respectively). RF further predicted key metallurgical coke quality (CRI/CSR) with <5% relative MAE, enabling reliable comparison of cost–quality trade-offs across coal blends. This combined approach makes it possible to accurately predict the coke quality, encourages the efficient use of lower-quality coals, leads to cost-effective, and sustainable coke production.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Results in Engineering
Published
2025-11-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.108121
Primary Topic
Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Machine learning enhanced model for predicting coking coal blend performance with low-rank coal additions

Bridjesh Pappula, Seshibe Makgato, N. K. Geetha, Shale Venda Mamabolo
Results in Engineering
Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
article

Machine learning enhanced model for predicting coking coal blend performance with low-rank coal additions

Bridjesh Pappula, Seshibe Makgato, N. K. Geetha, Shale Venda Mamabolo
article en

Abstract

• The current study developed a hybrid experimental - computational framework for coal blending. • Coal blending improved fixed carbon from 48.3 wt. % to 58.7 wt. % while reducing volatile matter to 28.9 wt. %. • Metallurgical blends achieved superior coke quality with CSR values of 66.0 - 69.8 and CRI values of 17.8 - 21.4. • Gieseler fluidity improved from 12 - 50 ddpm to 377 - 686 ddpm in metallurgical blends. • Random Forest regression outperformed traditional models achieving R² up to 0.97 with mean absolute errors as low as 0.05 wt. % for sulfur prediction. Achieving blast-furnace coke specifications while increasing the proportion of low-rank coals remains a key challenge for iron and steel producers. The current study addresses this challenge by integrating pilot plant-scale blending trials with multiscale characterization and machine learning to predict coke quality from coal blend properties. Ten blends from South African and imported coals were characterizedvia proximate/ultimate analyses, Gieseler rheology, ash chemistry, and standard coke tests. Transitioning from market-type blends (1 - 5) to metallurgical blends (6 - 10) lowered ash from approximately 14.6 - 15.4 wt.% to 11.8 - 12.6 wt.% and positioned the coke firmly within the metallurgical performance window (CRI ≈18–21, CSR ≈66–70, M40 ≈59–62, M10 ≈4.9–5.5). Additivity was observed for several coal parameters (e.g., ash, selected rheology measures), whereas sulfur content and volatile matter behaved non-linearly. Against linear and quadratic baselines, a validated Random Forest (RF) regressor most accurately mapped coal blend properties to coke quality, achieving R²≈0.97 for ash, 0.91 for sulfur content, and 0.93 for volatile -matter (test-set MAE ≈0.45 wt.%, 0.05 wt.%, and 1.50 wt.% respectively). RF further predicted key metallurgical coke quality (CRI/CSR) with <5% relative MAE, enabling reliable comparison of cost–quality trade-offs across coal blends. This combined approach makes it possible to accurately predict the coke quality, encourages the efficient use of lower-quality coals, leads to cost-effective, and sustainable coke production.

Results in EngineeringVol. 28
University of South Africa (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.