Democratic Backsliding and Endogenous Polarization

Abstract Leading accounts of contemporary democratic decline emphasize the role of polarization in enabling incumbent governments to dismantle democracy from within. This study offers a fuller portrait of this relationship, illustrating how incumbent attacks on democracy themselves produce polarization. We theorize a micro-level link between democratic backsliding events, elite opinion formation, and voter polarization to explain how incumbent efforts to subvert democracy increase negative feelings among citizens towards opposing partisans, thereby boosting polarization. Using survey experiments, survey data from electoral democracies, and expert-coded global macro-data, we find support for our argument. Regardless of how polarized society is prior, we demonstrate that incumbent actions that degrade democracy worsen polarization, an effect that is amplified when party elites endorse (rather than condemn) the leader’s behavior. The central message to emerge is that polarization is endogenous to democratic backsliding.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Political Behavior
Published
2025-11-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-025-10094-8
Primary Topic
Political Conflict and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Democratic Backsliding and Endogenous Polarization

Andrea Kendall-Taylor, Joseph Wright, Erica Frantz, Caner Şimşek
Political Behavior
Political Conflict and Governance
article

Democratic Backsliding and Endogenous Polarization

Andrea Kendall-Taylor, Joseph Wright, Erica Frantz, Caner Şimşek
article en

Abstract

Abstract Leading accounts of contemporary democratic decline emphasize the role of polarization in enabling incumbent governments to dismantle democracy from within. This study offers a fuller portrait of this relationship, illustrating how incumbent attacks on democracy themselves produce polarization. We theorize a micro-level link between democratic backsliding events, elite opinion formation, and voter polarization to explain how incumbent efforts to subvert democracy increase negative feelings among citizens towards opposing partisans, thereby boosting polarization. Using survey experiments, survey data from electoral democracies, and expert-coded global macro-data, we find support for our argument. Regardless of how polarized society is prior, we demonstrate that incumbent actions that degrade democracy worsen polarization, an effect that is amplified when party elites endorse (rather than condemn) the leader’s behavior. The central message to emerge is that polarization is endogenous to democratic backsliding.

Political Behavior
Kettering Foundation (US), Pennsylvania State University (US), University of Münster (DE), Center for a New American Security (US), Michigan State University (US)
University of Pennsylvania, Arizona State University, Florida International University, Pennsylvania State University
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Political Conflict and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.