Understanding novel district concepts: A structured exploration of interdisciplinary clustering in urban energy systems

Recently, there has been a surge of interest in novel concepts for jointly operating devices in urban areas in clusters, motivated by their potential to support decarbonization, enhance power system flexibility, and promote energy justice. Such clusters encompass multiple devices or buildings but operate on a smaller scale than cities. Examples include Renewable Energy Communities and Positive Energy Districts. These Novel District Concepts (NDCs) integrate interdisciplinary urban planning and social sciences terminology into the energy domain. However, these concepts’ precise definitions and practical implementation lack consistency, leading to conceptual ambiguities in the literature. The present paper reviews clustering approaches from both the energy domain and the urban planning and social sciences disciplines to analyze rules for defining device clusters. The findings reveal that while numerous papers claim novelty using Novel District Concepts terminology, many rely on established energy-domain methodologies, such as clustering techniques structured around electricity grid hierarchies. In contrast, clustering approaches from urban planning and social sciences, which employ spatial and social criteria, remain underutilized and lack systematic evaluation for energy system applications. The present paper’s key contribution lies in systematically identifying and differentiating clustering rules, establishing a robust foundation for subsequent cluster-based research, and ensuring methodological consistency. By integrating concepts from urban planning and social sciences with established energy-domain approaches, this paper delineates clear boundaries and grounds them contextually. The present paper’s structured methodology provides a comprehensive workflow for distinguishing diverse clustering rules, mitigating the risk of misapplied terminology, and facilitating future evaluations of their applicability to specific energy-system tasks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Reports
Published
2025-11-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2025.10.021
Primary Topic
Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding novel district concepts: A structured exploration of interdisciplinary clustering in urban energy systems

Ralf Mikut, Veit Hagenmeyer, Erfan Tajalli-Ardekani, Ömer Ekin et al.
Energy Reports
Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
article

Understanding novel district concepts: A structured exploration of interdisciplinary clustering in urban energy systems

Ralf Mikut, Veit Hagenmeyer, Erfan Tajalli-Ardekani, Ömer Ekin, Johannes Galenzowski, Simon Waczowicz, Hüseyin Çakmak, Sebastian Beichter
article en

Abstract

Recently, there has been a surge of interest in novel concepts for jointly operating devices in urban areas in clusters, motivated by their potential to support decarbonization, enhance power system flexibility, and promote energy justice. Such clusters encompass multiple devices or buildings but operate on a smaller scale than cities. Examples include Renewable Energy Communities and Positive Energy Districts. These Novel District Concepts (NDCs) integrate interdisciplinary urban planning and social sciences terminology into the energy domain. However, these concepts’ precise definitions and practical implementation lack consistency, leading to conceptual ambiguities in the literature. The present paper reviews clustering approaches from both the energy domain and the urban planning and social sciences disciplines to analyze rules for defining device clusters. The findings reveal that while numerous papers claim novelty using Novel District Concepts terminology, many rely on established energy-domain methodologies, such as clustering techniques structured around electricity grid hierarchies. In contrast, clustering approaches from urban planning and social sciences, which employ spatial and social criteria, remain underutilized and lack systematic evaluation for energy system applications. The present paper’s key contribution lies in systematically identifying and differentiating clustering rules, establishing a robust foundation for subsequent cluster-based research, and ensuring methodological consistency. By integrating concepts from urban planning and social sciences with established energy-domain approaches, this paper delineates clear boundaries and grounds them contextually. The present paper’s structured methodology provides a comprehensive workflow for distinguishing diverse clustering rules, mitigating the risk of misapplied terminology, and facilitating future evaluations of their applicability to specific energy-system tasks.

Energy ReportsVol. 14
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.