Predicting decision-makers' coping strategies in human-AI conflict based on the link between personality traits and cognitive AI appraisals: A quantitative study of U.S. employees using AI at work

As powerful AI aids become increasingly integrated into workplace decision-making, it becomes crucial to understand how employees respond to their recommendations, particularly when those recommendations conflict with their own judgments. We draw on cognitive appraisal theory and conflict management framework to examine how personality traits relate to different employee-AI conflict coping strategies via distinct appraisals of AI aids. In a three-wave study of 827 U.S. employees who regularly use AI aids at work, we measured the Big Five personality traits, employees' appraisals of these aids as both a threat and an opportunity to themselves, and four different types of conflict coping strategies when their judgment differs from that of the AI aid – avoiding, overruling, integrating and complying with the AI aid. Structural equation modeling with mediation analysis revealed nuanced indirect pathways. Beyond employees' interpersonal (human-human) conflict coping strategies and their use of AI aids (in terms of frequency and duration), we identified the following key findings: neuroticism and agreeableness showed exactly the opposite patterns – specifically, neuroticism (agreeableness) showed greater (lower) AI avoiding and overruling via increased (reduced) threat appraisals and less (more) integrating and complying via reduced (increased) opportunity appraisals; conscientiousness and openness to experience exhibited the same pattern – lower AI avoiding and overruling through reduced threat appraisals. This study provides new insights into employees' responses to conflicting AI recommendations, highlighting implications for implementation and augmentation strategies that consider individual trait differences. • How personality traits shape the way employees manage conflicts with AI? • The Big-five traits relate to different employee-AI conflict coping strategies. • These strategies are mediated by distinct (threat vs opportunity) AI appraisals. • Findings enable personality-based interventions for optimal human-AI collaboration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computers in Human Behavior Reports
Published
2025-11-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2025.100857
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.37
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predicting decision-makers' coping strategies in human-AI conflict based on the link between personality traits and cognitive AI appraisals: A quantitative study of U.S. employees using AI at work

Ilanit SimanTov‐Nachlieli, Olga Mondrus
1 citations
Computers in Human Behavior Reports
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
2.37
article

Predicting decision-makers' coping strategies in human-AI conflict based on the link between personality traits and cognitive AI appraisals: A quantitative study of U.S. employees using AI at work

Ilanit SimanTov‐Nachlieli, Olga Mondrus
article en
1 citations

Abstract

As powerful AI aids become increasingly integrated into workplace decision-making, it becomes crucial to understand how employees respond to their recommendations, particularly when those recommendations conflict with their own judgments. We draw on cognitive appraisal theory and conflict management framework to examine how personality traits relate to different employee-AI conflict coping strategies via distinct appraisals of AI aids. In a three-wave study of 827 U.S. employees who regularly use AI aids at work, we measured the Big Five personality traits, employees' appraisals of these aids as both a threat and an opportunity to themselves, and four different types of conflict coping strategies when their judgment differs from that of the AI aid – avoiding, overruling, integrating and complying with the AI aid. Structural equation modeling with mediation analysis revealed nuanced indirect pathways. Beyond employees' interpersonal (human-human) conflict coping strategies and their use of AI aids (in terms of frequency and duration), we identified the following key findings: neuroticism and agreeableness showed exactly the opposite patterns – specifically, neuroticism (agreeableness) showed greater (lower) AI avoiding and overruling via increased (reduced) threat appraisals and less (more) integrating and complying via reduced (increased) opportunity appraisals; conscientiousness and openness to experience exhibited the same pattern – lower AI avoiding and overruling through reduced threat appraisals. This study provides new insights into employees' responses to conflicting AI recommendations, highlighting implications for implementation and augmentation strategies that consider individual trait differences. • How personality traits shape the way employees manage conflicts with AI? • The Big-five traits relate to different employee-AI conflict coping strategies. • These strategies are mediated by distinct (threat vs opportunity) AI appraisals. • Findings enable personality-based interventions for optimal human-AI collaboration.

Computers in Human Behavior ReportsVol. 20
Tel Aviv University (IL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
2.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.