From “acteurs/actrices” to “zangers/zangeressen”: The Interpretation of Word Pairs and Generically Intended Masculine Role Nouns in Speakers of Dutch

Though intended to refer to everyone, generically intended masculine role nouns are often interpreted as referring (primarily) to men. While the use of more inclusive forms counters this bias, previous studies have largely focused on languages with a salient masculine/feminine grammatical gender distinction and used measures that focus participants’ attention on gender. The present study uses an indirect measure and investigates Dutch, a grammatical gender language that has largely lost the distinction between masculine and feminine gender, but still uses gender-specific marking for role nouns. A total of 130 participants named the first three people they could think of when presented with either a word pair (e.g., zangers/zangeressen– “singers masculine /singers feminine ”) or a generically intended masculine ( zangers ). Compared to the generically intended masculine form, word pairs increased the mental availability of nonmen, suggesting that a more inclusive form facilitates activation of nonmasculine exemplars for speakers of Dutch as well.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Language and Social Psychology
Published
2025-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927x251386476
Primary Topic
Gender Studies in Language
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From “acteurs/actrices” to “zangers/zangeressen”: The Interpretation of Word Pairs and Generically Intended Masculine Role Nouns in Speakers of Dutch

Hannah N. M. De Mulder, Femke Roos
Journal of Language and Social Psychology
Gender Studies in Language
article

From “acteurs/actrices” to “zangers/zangeressen”: The Interpretation of Word Pairs and Generically Intended Masculine Role Nouns in Speakers of Dutch

Hannah N. M. De Mulder, Femke Roos
article en

Abstract

Though intended to refer to everyone, generically intended masculine role nouns are often interpreted as referring (primarily) to men. While the use of more inclusive forms counters this bias, previous studies have largely focused on languages with a salient masculine/feminine grammatical gender distinction and used measures that focus participants’ attention on gender. The present study uses an indirect measure and investigates Dutch, a grammatical gender language that has largely lost the distinction between masculine and feminine gender, but still uses gender-specific marking for role nouns. A total of 130 participants named the first three people they could think of when presented with either a word pair (e.g., zangers/zangeressen– “singers masculine /singers feminine ”) or a generically intended masculine ( zangers ). Compared to the generically intended masculine form, word pairs increased the mental availability of nonmen, suggesting that a more inclusive form facilitates activation of nonmasculine exemplars for speakers of Dutch as well.

Journal of Language and Social PsychologyVol. 45(2)
Leiden University (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Gender Studies in Language
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.