Individual recognition in guppies does not require large brains

Abstract It is often assumed that group-living animals require larger brains in order to deal with the various social challenges they encounter. One such key challenge is the need to recognize and discriminate between specific group members. Individual recognition is often deemed the most cognitively demanding form of recognition. Hence, one could expect this ability to be facilitated by the evolution of larger brains. So far, this hypothesis remains largely untested. In this study, we investigated the link between relative brain size and individual recognition, using Trinidadian guppies ( Poecilia reticulata ) from artificial selection lines for either increased or decreased relative brain size. In a first experiment, we compared the selection lines in their ability to spontaneously discriminate between a familiar and unfamiliar conspecific. In a second experiment, we actively trained guppies from the selection lines to associate a particular individual with the presence of food. Overall, we found evidence for individual recognition, confirming earlier research on this species. However, individual recognition was independent of brain size selection regime in both experiments. Guppies spontaneously recognized and preferably associated with a familiar individual. In the trained association experiment, however, fish showed no preference for either stimulus fish. Our study suggests that although small fishes like the guppy are capable of individual recognition, larger brains do not necessarily facilitate this ability. Our study demonstrates that to fully understand the link between sociality and cognition, one needs to verify which exact social challenges require the evolution of larger brains. Significance statement Living in a group is a complex challenge, and is thus said to require relatively large brains. Despite this assumption, there is very little known about which particular aspects of group-living are actually cognitively demanding to a degree that they require a higher investment in brain tissue. Here, we tested the specific hypothesis that the ability to recognize and remember specific individuals, i.e. individual recognition, a keystone of sociality, is cognitively challenging by comparing guppies with known differences in relative brain size in their ability to recognize a familiar shoal-member and learn the difference between two new individuals. Although guppies demonstrated individual recognition, relative brain size did not affect their performance. Our results provide valuable insights in the evolution of sociality and its link with relative brain size.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
Published
2025-11-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-025-03667-4
Primary Topic
Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Individual recognition in guppies does not require large brains

Gilles De Meester, Jake M. Martin, Niclas Kolm, John L. Fitzpatrick et al.
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications
article

Individual recognition in guppies does not require large brains

Gilles De Meester, Jake M. Martin, Niclas Kolm, John L. Fitzpatrick, Alexander Kotrschal, Dylan Brimaud, Markus Wollin
article en

Abstract

Abstract It is often assumed that group-living animals require larger brains in order to deal with the various social challenges they encounter. One such key challenge is the need to recognize and discriminate between specific group members. Individual recognition is often deemed the most cognitively demanding form of recognition. Hence, one could expect this ability to be facilitated by the evolution of larger brains. So far, this hypothesis remains largely untested. In this study, we investigated the link between relative brain size and individual recognition, using Trinidadian guppies ( Poecilia reticulata ) from artificial selection lines for either increased or decreased relative brain size. In a first experiment, we compared the selection lines in their ability to spontaneously discriminate between a familiar and unfamiliar conspecific. In a second experiment, we actively trained guppies from the selection lines to associate a particular individual with the presence of food. Overall, we found evidence for individual recognition, confirming earlier research on this species. However, individual recognition was independent of brain size selection regime in both experiments. Guppies spontaneously recognized and preferably associated with a familiar individual. In the trained association experiment, however, fish showed no preference for either stimulus fish. Our study suggests that although small fishes like the guppy are capable of individual recognition, larger brains do not necessarily facilitate this ability. Our study demonstrates that to fully understand the link between sociality and cognition, one needs to verify which exact social challenges require the evolution of larger brains. Significance statement Living in a group is a complex challenge, and is thus said to require relatively large brains. Despite this assumption, there is very little known about which particular aspects of group-living are actually cognitively demanding to a degree that they require a higher investment in brain tissue. Here, we tested the specific hypothesis that the ability to recognize and remember specific individuals, i.e. individual recognition, a keystone of sociality, is cognitively challenging by comparing guppies with known differences in relative brain size in their ability to recognize a familiar shoal-member and learn the difference between two new individuals. Although guppies demonstrated individual recognition, relative brain size did not affect their performance. Our results provide valuable insights in the evolution of sociality and its link with relative brain size.

Behavioral Ecology and SociobiologyVol. 79(12)
Deakin University (AU), Stockholm University (SE), Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SE), Centre for Research on Ecology and Forestry Applications (ES), Monash University (AU), Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas, Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse, Vetenskapsrådet, Stockholms Universitet
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.