EU Migration Governance Beyond Its Borders: Informal Migration Diplomacy in Lebanon’s Syria Refugee Response, 2012–2024

This article examines Lebanon’s informal, often opaque, migration governance in response to the Syrian refugee crisis (2012–2024), shaped significantly by EU external migration policies. Lebanon’s approach relies on elite bargains and back-door agreements, sidestepping formal policy processes within its sectarian, consociational political system. The EU’s influence, grounded in extensive financial aid, aims to contain refugee movements within Lebanon, aligning with its broader migration control objectives. However, Lebanon’s fragmented political structure enables it to selectively implement policies, leveraging its strategic position to secure funding without committing to strict compliance as a part of the country’s informal migration diplomacy. The result is a highly informalized, ad hoc governance model where NGOs play a critical role, but where elite corruption and clientelism continue to hamper effective policy. This dynamic underscores the power asymmetry between the EU and Lebanon, and reveals the limitations of externally driven governance models in contexts marked by political division and elite capture.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Progress in Development Studies
Published
2025-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14649934251388773
Primary Topic
Middle East Politics and Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

EU Migration Governance Beyond Its Borders: Informal Migration Diplomacy in Lebanon’s Syria Refugee Response, 2012–2024

Are John Knudsen, Nadia Nameh
Progress in Development Studies
Middle East Politics and Society
article

EU Migration Governance Beyond Its Borders: Informal Migration Diplomacy in Lebanon’s Syria Refugee Response, 2012–2024

Are John Knudsen, Nadia Nameh
article en

Abstract

This article examines Lebanon’s informal, often opaque, migration governance in response to the Syrian refugee crisis (2012–2024), shaped significantly by EU external migration policies. Lebanon’s approach relies on elite bargains and back-door agreements, sidestepping formal policy processes within its sectarian, consociational political system. The EU’s influence, grounded in extensive financial aid, aims to contain refugee movements within Lebanon, aligning with its broader migration control objectives. However, Lebanon’s fragmented political structure enables it to selectively implement policies, leveraging its strategic position to secure funding without committing to strict compliance as a part of the country’s informal migration diplomacy. The result is a highly informalized, ad hoc governance model where NGOs play a critical role, but where elite corruption and clientelism continue to hamper effective policy. This dynamic underscores the power asymmetry between the EU and Lebanon, and reveals the limitations of externally driven governance models in contexts marked by political division and elite capture.

Progress in Development Studies
Chr. Michelsen Institute (NO), American University of Beirut (LB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Middle East Politics and Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.