Classifying climate-related failures for regional-national railway networks

The frequency and intensity of extreme weather events pose various types of hazards and vulnerabilities to the railway system. This article aims to challenge the assumption that a single, nationally and internationally aggregated model is sufficient to capture region-specific failure patterns. While useful, these national models are often unable to account for linkages and feedback between heterogeneous regions and associated railway failure mechanisms and processes. This study develops and evaluates regional-national specific machine learning (ML) framework to enhance the classification of climate-related railway failures utilizing a synchronized five-fold cross-validation strategy.We illustrate the approach through a case study of the Switches and Crossings (S&C) assets across five railway operational regions in Sweden, over a 24-year period, to demonstrate meaningful climate variability. Our methodology provides a consistent procedure that consistently compares national models with region-specific models. Results show that the localized model outperforms the national baseline, with improvements of up to 2.0% in Matthews Correlation Coefficient and 1.2% in F1-score at the 24-hour window preceding failure. Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) analysis revealed regionally distinct predictors, such as snow accumulation in the North and weather data coverage issues in the West. The results provide a basis for further process refinement, offering interpretable insights for operation and maintenance planning, risk assessment and supporting climate adaptation actions to achieve a climate-proof and resilient railway system.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Climate Risk Management
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2025.100764
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Railway Systems and Energy Efficiency
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.24
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Classifying climate-related failures for regional-national railway networks

Stephen Mayowa Famurewa, Khosro Soleimani-Chamkhorami, A. H. S. Garmabaki, Abdolamir Karbalaie
1 citations
Climate Risk Management
Railway Systems and Energy Efficiency
1.24
article

Classifying climate-related failures for regional-national railway networks

Stephen Mayowa Famurewa, Khosro Soleimani-Chamkhorami, A. H. S. Garmabaki, Abdolamir Karbalaie
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The frequency and intensity of extreme weather events pose various types of hazards and vulnerabilities to the railway system. This article aims to challenge the assumption that a single, nationally and internationally aggregated model is sufficient to capture region-specific failure patterns. While useful, these national models are often unable to account for linkages and feedback between heterogeneous regions and associated railway failure mechanisms and processes. This study develops and evaluates regional-national specific machine learning (ML) framework to enhance the classification of climate-related railway failures utilizing a synchronized five-fold cross-validation strategy.We illustrate the approach through a case study of the Switches and Crossings (S&C) assets across five railway operational regions in Sweden, over a 24-year period, to demonstrate meaningful climate variability. Our methodology provides a consistent procedure that consistently compares national models with region-specific models. Results show that the localized model outperforms the national baseline, with improvements of up to 2.0% in Matthews Correlation Coefficient and 1.2% in F1-score at the 24-hour window preceding failure. Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) analysis revealed regionally distinct predictors, such as snow accumulation in the North and weather data coverage issues in the West. The results provide a basis for further process refinement, offering interpretable insights for operation and maintenance planning, risk assessment and supporting climate adaptation actions to achieve a climate-proof and resilient railway system.

Climate Risk ManagementVol. 50
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Railway Systems and Energy Efficiency
1.24
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.