The Monetary Policy–Commodities Nexus: A Survey

ABSTRACT This survey synthesizes evidence on the bidirectional links between commodity markets and monetary policy. On the commodities‐to‐policy side, we review how shocks to energy, food, and metals pass through to inflation, inflation expectations, economic activity, and financial stability in state‐dependent ways that vary by shock type, exposure, and policy regime. We complement the literature with an analysis of central‐bank speeches, showing how officials classify commodity shocks and how these framings map into policy stances. On the policy‐to‐commodities side, we organize evidence on the transmission of monetary policy to commodity markets via financial, real‐economy, and expectations channels, highlighting heterogeneity across policy instruments, commodities, and central banks. We emphasize how financialization tightens cross‐asset linkages, raises leverage and margin sensitivity, and amplifies discount‐rate and risk‐taking mechanisms. Overall, commodities are best treated as policy‐sensitive state variables, not exogenous disturbances, with implications for policy design, central bank communication, and international monetary spillovers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Economic Surveys
Published
2025-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.70025
Primary Topic
Market Dynamics and Volatility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Monetary Policy–Commodities Nexus: A Survey

Pierre L. Siklos, Martin T. Bohl, Niklas Humann
Journal of Economic Surveys
Market Dynamics and Volatility
article

The Monetary Policy–Commodities Nexus: A Survey

Pierre L. Siklos, Martin T. Bohl, Niklas Humann
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This survey synthesizes evidence on the bidirectional links between commodity markets and monetary policy. On the commodities‐to‐policy side, we review how shocks to energy, food, and metals pass through to inflation, inflation expectations, economic activity, and financial stability in state‐dependent ways that vary by shock type, exposure, and policy regime. We complement the literature with an analysis of central‐bank speeches, showing how officials classify commodity shocks and how these framings map into policy stances. On the policy‐to‐commodities side, we organize evidence on the transmission of monetary policy to commodity markets via financial, real‐economy, and expectations channels, highlighting heterogeneity across policy instruments, commodities, and central banks. We emphasize how financialization tightens cross‐asset linkages, raises leverage and margin sensitivity, and amplifies discount‐rate and risk‐taking mechanisms. Overall, commodities are best treated as policy‐sensitive state variables, not exogenous disturbances, with implications for policy design, central bank communication, and international monetary spillovers.

Journal of Economic SurveysVol. 40(2)
University of Münster (DE), Balsillie School of International Affairs (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Market Dynamics and Volatility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.