Controlled trial of cervical cancer screening frequency among human‐papillomavirus‐vaccinated women

Cervical screening frequency has not been studied in vaccinees. As the major risk factor, oncogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) is declining due to vaccination. We report a trial to assess the effectiveness of cervical screening frequency among women HPV-vaccinated as early adolescents (NCT02149030). In 2013, 5626 1992-1995-born women, who had received three doses of the HPV16/18 vaccine at ages 12-15 between 2007 and 2010 in a community-randomized vaccination trial (NCT00534638), were allocated at age 22 into high-intensity cytology-based cervical screening by even birth date (Arm A1) or into low-intensity cytology-based cervical screening by odd birth date (Arm A2). One thousand three hundred thirty-three women who received HPV16/18 vaccination at age 18 attended a safety of low intensity-screening arm (Arm A3). Low-intensity screening, where low-grade cytological abnormalities were not revealed for 6 years, was compared to the standard high-intensity screening used in Finland at the time. The prevalence of cytological and HPV findings was calculated at ages 22/25/28. The hazard ratio of histopathologically confirmed immediate cervical cancer precursors (HSIL/CIN2+) among participants was compared between low- and high-intensity screening arms. The overall occurrence of CIN2+ was comparable in Arms A1, 0.70% and A2, 0.66%, with the corresponding hazard ratio at age 28 being 0.97 (95% confidence intervals, 0.50-1.88). By age 28, the occurrence of vaccine-HPV types 16/18 was reduced up to 88% in the 12-to-15 compared to 18-year-old HPV-vaccinated women. In conclusion, the risk of CIN2+ was similar for HPV-vaccinated women who attended low-intensity cervical screening compared to high-intensity screening most likely due to the decline of oncogenic HPVs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Cancer
Published
2025-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.70229
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.71
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Controlled trial of cervical cancer screening frequency among human‐papillomavirus‐vaccinated women

Matti Lehtinen, Anna Söderlund‐Strand, Mònica Ortega Llobet, Joakim Dillner et al.
2 citations
International Journal of Cancer
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
2.71
article

Controlled trial of cervical cancer screening frequency among human‐papillomavirus‐vaccinated women

Matti Lehtinen, Anna Söderlund‐Strand, Mònica Ortega Llobet, Joakim Dillner, Tiina Eriksson, Penelope Grace Gray, Ville Nikolai Pimenoff, Camilla Lagheden, Iacopo Baussano, Miriam Elfström, Pekka Nieminen
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Cervical screening frequency has not been studied in vaccinees. As the major risk factor, oncogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) is declining due to vaccination. We report a trial to assess the effectiveness of cervical screening frequency among women HPV-vaccinated as early adolescents (NCT02149030). In 2013, 5626 1992-1995-born women, who had received three doses of the HPV16/18 vaccine at ages 12-15 between 2007 and 2010 in a community-randomized vaccination trial (NCT00534638), were allocated at age 22 into high-intensity cytology-based cervical screening by even birth date (Arm A1) or into low-intensity cytology-based cervical screening by odd birth date (Arm A2). One thousand three hundred thirty-three women who received HPV16/18 vaccination at age 18 attended a safety of low intensity-screening arm (Arm A3). Low-intensity screening, where low-grade cytological abnormalities were not revealed for 6 years, was compared to the standard high-intensity screening used in Finland at the time. The prevalence of cytological and HPV findings was calculated at ages 22/25/28. The hazard ratio of histopathologically confirmed immediate cervical cancer precursors (HSIL/CIN2+) among participants was compared between low- and high-intensity screening arms. The overall occurrence of CIN2+ was comparable in Arms A1, 0.70% and A2, 0.66%, with the corresponding hazard ratio at age 28 being 0.97 (95% confidence intervals, 0.50-1.88). By age 28, the occurrence of vaccine-HPV types 16/18 was reduced up to 88% in the 12-to-15 compared to 18-year-old HPV-vaccinated women. In conclusion, the risk of CIN2+ was similar for HPV-vaccinated women who attended low-intensity cervical screening compared to high-intensity screening most likely due to the decline of oncogenic HPVs.

International Journal of CancerVol. 158(7)
University of Helsinki (FI), Tampere University (FI), Lund University (SE), Karolinska Institutet (SE), Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare (FI), Skåne University Hospital (SE), Centre international de recherche sur le cancer (FR), Oulu University of Applied Sciences (FI), University of Oulu (FI)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
2.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.