Landslide dam breaching under combined hydraulic loads: Experimental insights into surge–overflow synergy

Landslide dam breaching posed severe threats to downstream communities and infrastructure, making the understanding of their failure mechanisms under complex hydraulic conditions crucial for disaster risk mitigation. This study systematically investigated the breaching hydraulics of a landslide dam under two scenarios: (1) overflow-only conditions and (2) combined surge wave and overflow conditions, through 12 controlled flume experiments (eight small-scale and four large-scale tests). Comparative analysis revealed critical differences in dam failure characteristics. Under overflow-only conditions, the breaching process followed conventional hydraulic erosion patterns, while the combined surge–overflow scenario exhibited significantly different behavior. Experimental results showed that surge wave action increased total discharge by 2.3–4.9 times that in overflow-only conditions, and prolonged breach development. The interaction between surge waves and overflow produced complex hydrodynamics characterized by water level fluctuations, partial blockage, and reduced flow efficiency. Whether surge waves can trigger failure of a critically overtopped landslide dam depends on simultaneous satisfaction of three conditions: (1) Δ H > 0 (where Δ H is the difference between the highest surge wave level and effective dam height), (2) ξ f / W c > 0.092 (where ξ f is the wave height of the first surge wave overtopping the dam and W c is the dam crest width along the flow direction), and (3) N E > 10.5 (where N E is the number of effective secondary wave erosion events). The timing between surge arrival and overflow peak discharge predominantly controlled total outflow volume, with early surge-wave superposition causing the most severe discharge impacts. These findings provide a new quantitative framework for assessing landslide dam stability under complex loading conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Water Science and Engineering
Published
2025-11-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wse.2025.11.003
Primary Topic
Dam Engineering and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Landslide dam breaching under combined hydraulic loads: Experimental insights into surge–overflow synergy

Jie Liu, Daixin Deng, Hong Xiao, Lei Fu et al.
Water Science and Engineering
Dam Engineering and Safety
article

Landslide dam breaching under combined hydraulic loads: Experimental insights into surge–overflow synergy

Jie Liu, Daixin Deng, Hong Xiao, Lei Fu, M. Liao
article en

Abstract

Landslide dam breaching posed severe threats to downstream communities and infrastructure, making the understanding of their failure mechanisms under complex hydraulic conditions crucial for disaster risk mitigation. This study systematically investigated the breaching hydraulics of a landslide dam under two scenarios: (1) overflow-only conditions and (2) combined surge wave and overflow conditions, through 12 controlled flume experiments (eight small-scale and four large-scale tests). Comparative analysis revealed critical differences in dam failure characteristics. Under overflow-only conditions, the breaching process followed conventional hydraulic erosion patterns, while the combined surge–overflow scenario exhibited significantly different behavior. Experimental results showed that surge wave action increased total discharge by 2.3–4.9 times that in overflow-only conditions, and prolonged breach development. The interaction between surge waves and overflow produced complex hydrodynamics characterized by water level fluctuations, partial blockage, and reduced flow efficiency. Whether surge waves can trigger failure of a critically overtopped landslide dam depends on simultaneous satisfaction of three conditions: (1) Δ H > 0 (where Δ H is the difference between the highest surge wave level and effective dam height), (2) ξ f / W c > 0.092 (where ξ f is the wave height of the first surge wave overtopping the dam and W c is the dam crest width along the flow direction), and (3) N E > 10.5 (where N E is the number of effective secondary wave erosion events). The timing between surge arrival and overflow peak discharge predominantly controlled total outflow volume, with early surge-wave superposition causing the most severe discharge impacts. These findings provide a new quantitative framework for assessing landslide dam stability under complex loading conditions.

Water Science and EngineeringVol. 19(1)
Sichuan University (CN), State Key Laboratory of Hydraulics and Mountain River Engineering, Sichuan University of Science and Engineering (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Dam Engineering and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.