Deconstructing the Livestock Manure Digester and Biogas Controversy

Manure digesters can mitigate some impacts from industrial animal agriculture, such as odors and methane emissions, while potentially increasing or perpetuating others, such as ammonia emissions and nutrient pollution. While promoted as a climate solution, manure digesters only address a fraction of livestock-related greenhouse gas emissions and may exacerbate or introduce new occupational and community hazards, such as from flared biogas. Policies play a large role in subsidizing manure digesters, incentivizing further expansion of industrial animal agriculture-an industry with documented harms to rural populations. In summary, proponent claims in many cases overstated the evidence of actual benefits, while opponent concerns were either validated by the evidence or merit further investigation. Based on the current state of available evidence, manure digesters should not be promoted as a solution for manure management and energy production.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Environmental Health Reports
Published
2025-11-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40572-025-00512-8
Primary Topic
Odor and Emission Control Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Deconstructing the Livestock Manure Digester and Biogas Controversy

Brent F. Kim, Christopher D. Heaney, Jamie Harding, David C. Love et al.
Current Environmental Health Reports
Odor and Emission Control Technologies
article

Deconstructing the Livestock Manure Digester and Biogas Controversy

Brent F. Kim, Christopher D. Heaney, Jamie Harding, David C. Love, Keeve E. Nachman, Qinfan Lyu, Benjamin F. Hobbs, D’Ann L. Williams, Allie Wainer
article en

Abstract

Manure digesters can mitigate some impacts from industrial animal agriculture, such as odors and methane emissions, while potentially increasing or perpetuating others, such as ammonia emissions and nutrient pollution. While promoted as a climate solution, manure digesters only address a fraction of livestock-related greenhouse gas emissions and may exacerbate or introduce new occupational and community hazards, such as from flared biogas. Policies play a large role in subsidizing manure digesters, incentivizing further expansion of industrial animal agriculture-an industry with documented harms to rural populations. In summary, proponent claims in many cases overstated the evidence of actual benefits, while opponent concerns were either validated by the evidence or merit further investigation. Based on the current state of available evidence, manure digesters should not be promoted as a solution for manure management and energy production.

Current Environmental Health ReportsVol. 12(1)
Johns Hopkins University (US), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US), Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory (US)
AgStar Financial Services, ACA, Johns Hopkins University
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Odor and Emission Control Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Deconstructing the Livestock Manure Digester and Biogas Controversy — Brent F. Kim, Christopher D. Heaney, et al. · Current Environmental Health Reports (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS