University students' security behavior against email phishing attacks: insights from the health belief model

Abstract Despite advancements in technical defenses, phishing attacks persist due to end-user vulnerabilities and behaviors, including shadow security behaviors like bypassing established protocols. Traditional cybersecurity awareness programs often fail to change behavior effectively because they adopt generic approaches, overlooking the psychological and behavioral factors influencing security practices. To address this, the emerging field of behavioral cybersecurity aims to understand and influence human behavior in cybersecurity contexts. In particular, the Health Belief Model (HBM), traditionally applied in health contexts, has shown promise in predicting cybersecurity behaviors. This study applied an adapted HBM to examine factors influencing university students' security behaviors in response to email phishing attacks. Self-reported data were collected from 569 university students at Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta, Indonesia, using convenience sampling. Confirmatory factor analysis and covariance-based structural equation modeling were employed for data analysis. The results revealed that perceived severity, perceived importance, self-efficacy, and cues to action were statistically significant predictors of security behavior. Students who perceived phishing attacks as severe, recognized the importance of security measures, responded to cues to action, and felt confident in their ability to protect themselves were more likely to engage in security behaviors. However, perceived susceptibility to phishing attacks and perceived barriers to adopting security measures did not show significant relationships with security behavior. However, due to the inherent limitations of self-reported data, the terms “security behavior” and “student security behavior” should be understood as reflective of perceived or intended actions, rather than actual observed behaviors. Despite these limitations, this study provides valuable insights into human-related cybersecurity vulnerabilities by identifying key psychological and behavioral factors influencing security behavior. In doing so, it responds to calls for studies that apply psychological frameworks and models to better understand how individuals respond to security threats and develop more effective protection strategies. Thus, the findings remain relevant and will support the creation of tailored security awareness programs designed to meet the specific needs and characteristics of the studied demographics, ultimately contributing meaningfully to the enhancement of cybersecurity resilience.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cybersecurity
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/cybsec/tyaf034
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Spam and Phishing Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.25
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

University students' security behavior against email phishing attacks: insights from the health belief model

Anderson Kevin Gwenhure
1 citations
Journal of Cybersecurity
Spam and Phishing Detection
3.25
article

University students' security behavior against email phishing attacks: insights from the health belief model

Anderson Kevin Gwenhure
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Despite advancements in technical defenses, phishing attacks persist due to end-user vulnerabilities and behaviors, including shadow security behaviors like bypassing established protocols. Traditional cybersecurity awareness programs often fail to change behavior effectively because they adopt generic approaches, overlooking the psychological and behavioral factors influencing security practices. To address this, the emerging field of behavioral cybersecurity aims to understand and influence human behavior in cybersecurity contexts. In particular, the Health Belief Model (HBM), traditionally applied in health contexts, has shown promise in predicting cybersecurity behaviors. This study applied an adapted HBM to examine factors influencing university students' security behaviors in response to email phishing attacks. Self-reported data were collected from 569 university students at Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta, Indonesia, using convenience sampling. Confirmatory factor analysis and covariance-based structural equation modeling were employed for data analysis. The results revealed that perceived severity, perceived importance, self-efficacy, and cues to action were statistically significant predictors of security behavior. Students who perceived phishing attacks as severe, recognized the importance of security measures, responded to cues to action, and felt confident in their ability to protect themselves were more likely to engage in security behaviors. However, perceived susceptibility to phishing attacks and perceived barriers to adopting security measures did not show significant relationships with security behavior. However, due to the inherent limitations of self-reported data, the terms “security behavior” and “student security behavior” should be understood as reflective of perceived or intended actions, rather than actual observed behaviors. Despite these limitations, this study provides valuable insights into human-related cybersecurity vulnerabilities by identifying key psychological and behavioral factors influencing security behavior. In doing so, it responds to calls for studies that apply psychological frameworks and models to better understand how individuals respond to security threats and develop more effective protection strategies. Thus, the findings remain relevant and will support the creation of tailored security awareness programs designed to meet the specific needs and characteristics of the studied demographics, ultimately contributing meaningfully to the enhancement of cybersecurity resilience.

Journal of CybersecurityVol. 11(1)
Atma Jaya University Yogyakarta (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Spam and Phishing Detection
3.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.