Minimum inhibitory concentrations of sulfonamides and trimethoprim for veterinary pathogens: New data for old antibiotics

Targeted interpretation of antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) raw data is highly dependent on the availability of appropriate interpretative criteria, such as clinical breakpoints (CBP) or at least epidemiological cut-off values (ECOFF) as potential surrogates for CBPs. However, these criteria have not yet been defined for important first line antibiotics used to treat infections with veterinary pathogens. Therefore, the aims of our study were, (1) to produce minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) distributions for important veterinary pathogens with trimethoprim - sulfamethoxazole 1:19 combination and with sulfamethoxazole, sulfadiazine, sulfadimethoxine, and trimethoprim alone, furthermore, (2) to estimate the proportion of microbiological resistance to sulfonamides and trimethoprim in the selected bacterial species, and lastly, (3) to propose presumptive quality control (QC) ranges for potential QC strain candidates. MIC determination was carried out by broth microdilution according to the recommendations of the European committee on antimicrobial susceptibility testing (EUCAST). For the majority of the veterinary pathogens analysed, MIC distributions for trimethoprim - sulfamethoxazole 1:19, sulfamethoxazole, and trimethoprim met the EUCAST criteria and presumptive ECOFFs could be proposed. In contrast, for sulfadiazine and sulfadimethoxine the tested concentration ranges (> 256 mg/L) were too low for generating data acceptable for estimation of presumptive ECOFFs. The presented MIC distributions form the basis for an inter-laboratory study with the goal to generate aggregated MIC data to be submitted to the EUCAST steering committee for setting missing ECOFFs for sulfonamides and trimethoprim and thereby supporting the use of these first-line antibiotics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Veterinary Microbiology
Published
2025-11-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2025.110784
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.39
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Minimum inhibitory concentrations of sulfonamides and trimethoprim for veterinary pathogens: New data for old antibiotics

Ludovic Pelligand, Andrew Mead, Alexis Viel, Marine Boulanger et al.
1 citations
Veterinary Microbiology
Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy
1.39
article

Minimum inhibitory concentrations of sulfonamides and trimethoprim for veterinary pathogens: New data for old antibiotics

Ludovic Pelligand, Andrew Mead, Alexis Viel, Marine Boulanger, Aude A. Ferran, Nadine Ruchti, Gudrun Overesch
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Targeted interpretation of antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) raw data is highly dependent on the availability of appropriate interpretative criteria, such as clinical breakpoints (CBP) or at least epidemiological cut-off values (ECOFF) as potential surrogates for CBPs. However, these criteria have not yet been defined for important first line antibiotics used to treat infections with veterinary pathogens. Therefore, the aims of our study were, (1) to produce minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) distributions for important veterinary pathogens with trimethoprim - sulfamethoxazole 1:19 combination and with sulfamethoxazole, sulfadiazine, sulfadimethoxine, and trimethoprim alone, furthermore, (2) to estimate the proportion of microbiological resistance to sulfonamides and trimethoprim in the selected bacterial species, and lastly, (3) to propose presumptive quality control (QC) ranges for potential QC strain candidates. MIC determination was carried out by broth microdilution according to the recommendations of the European committee on antimicrobial susceptibility testing (EUCAST). For the majority of the veterinary pathogens analysed, MIC distributions for trimethoprim - sulfamethoxazole 1:19, sulfamethoxazole, and trimethoprim met the EUCAST criteria and presumptive ECOFFs could be proposed. In contrast, for sulfadiazine and sulfadimethoxine the tested concentration ranges (> 256 mg/L) were too low for generating data acceptable for estimation of presumptive ECOFFs. The presented MIC distributions form the basis for an inter-laboratory study with the goal to generate aggregated MIC data to be submitted to the EUCAST steering committee for setting missing ECOFFs for sulfonamides and trimethoprim and thereby supporting the use of these first-line antibiotics.

Veterinary MicrobiologyVol. 312
University of Bern (CH), Royal Veterinary College (GB), École Nationale Vétérinaire de Toulouse (FR), Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR), Centre Hospitalier de Fougères (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy
1.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.