Process first, tools second: A conceptual framework to embed digital participation in planning processes for citizen empowerment

Digital participation tools hold the promise to empower citizens and local communities to address urban development challenges. However, although many scholars have experimented with digital tools for citizen engagement, their efforts remain largely disconnected from planning practice. To address this disconnection, this paper analyses digital participation in planning from three perspectives: participatory planning, citizen engagement level, and human–computer interaction (HCI). We considered a wide range of digital participation tools, from tools designed for research projects to commercial and open-source tools. Our results show that there are two levels of “power mediation” and their “mediating actors” in digital participatory planning: (1) the digital tool and the HCI designer who creates the tool, and (2) the planning cycle and the planner who defines the participatory process. We furthermore highlight the importance of embedding participation tools in complementarity with each other to empower citizens at different levels. Taking these two insights into account, we developed an integrated framework – the EmpowerCycle – to embed digital participation tools in planning processes for citizen empowerment. The framework addresses the disconnection between digital tools and planning practice, supporting both researchers and practitioners in the design and implementation of digital participation tools in planning practice and decision-making processes. • Embeds digital participation tools in planning processes to meaningfully empower citizens • Multidisciplinary analysis of 14 digital tools from planning, engagement, and HCI perspectives • Reveals two levels of power mediation and mediating actors in digital participatory planning • Presents the EmpowerCycle for the design and implementation of digital participation tools • Calls for understanding the planning process first, before introducing new participation tools

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cities
Published
2025-11-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2025.106645
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Urban Planning and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.18
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Process first, tools second: A conceptual framework to embed digital participation in planning processes for citizen empowerment

Juliana E. Gonçalves, Shahryar Sarabi, Gamze Dane, Geertje Slingerland
1 citations
Cities
Urban Planning and Governance
6.18
article

Process first, tools second: A conceptual framework to embed digital participation in planning processes for citizen empowerment

Juliana E. Gonçalves, Shahryar Sarabi, Gamze Dane, Geertje Slingerland
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Digital participation tools hold the promise to empower citizens and local communities to address urban development challenges. However, although many scholars have experimented with digital tools for citizen engagement, their efforts remain largely disconnected from planning practice. To address this disconnection, this paper analyses digital participation in planning from three perspectives: participatory planning, citizen engagement level, and human–computer interaction (HCI). We considered a wide range of digital participation tools, from tools designed for research projects to commercial and open-source tools. Our results show that there are two levels of “power mediation” and their “mediating actors” in digital participatory planning: (1) the digital tool and the HCI designer who creates the tool, and (2) the planning cycle and the planner who defines the participatory process. We furthermore highlight the importance of embedding participation tools in complementarity with each other to empower citizens at different levels. Taking these two insights into account, we developed an integrated framework – the EmpowerCycle – to embed digital participation tools in planning processes for citizen empowerment. The framework addresses the disconnection between digital tools and planning practice, supporting both researchers and practitioners in the design and implementation of digital participation tools in planning practice and decision-making processes. • Embeds digital participation tools in planning processes to meaningfully empower citizens • Multidisciplinary analysis of 14 digital tools from planning, engagement, and HCI perspectives • Reveals two levels of power mediation and mediating actors in digital participatory planning • Presents the EmpowerCycle for the design and implementation of digital participation tools • Calls for understanding the planning process first, before introducing new participation tools

CitiesVol. 170
Eindhoven University of Technology (NL), Delft University of Technology (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Urban Planning and Governance
6.18
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.