Get Global Guarantees: On the Probabilistic Nature of Perturbation Robustness

Robustness is a critical requirement for deploying machine learning models in safety-sensitive domains, where even imperceptible input perturbations can lead to hazardous outcomes. However, existing robustness assessment techniques prior to deployment often face a trade-off between computational feasibility and measurement precision, limiting their effectiveness in practice. To address these limitations, we provide a systematic comparative study of prevailing robustness definitions and their corresponding evaluation methodologies. Building on this analysis, we propose tower robustness, which is a novel and practical concept setting out from a global perspective. Further, we provide upper and lower bounds of tower robustness, based on hypothesis testing, for quantitative evaluation, enabling more rigorous and efficient pre-deployment assessments. Through empirical investigation, we demonstrate that our approach provides reliable robustness assessments. These findings advance the systematic understanding of robustness and contribute a practical framework for enhancing the safety of machine learning models in safety-critical applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3746252.3761039
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.48
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Get Global Guarantees: On the Probabilistic Nature of Perturbation Robustness

Kwan Hui Lim, Wenchuan Mu
1 citations
Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
2.48
article

Get Global Guarantees: On the Probabilistic Nature of Perturbation Robustness

Kwan Hui Lim, Wenchuan Mu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Robustness is a critical requirement for deploying machine learning models in safety-sensitive domains, where even imperceptible input perturbations can lead to hazardous outcomes. However, existing robustness assessment techniques prior to deployment often face a trade-off between computational feasibility and measurement precision, limiting their effectiveness in practice. To address these limitations, we provide a systematic comparative study of prevailing robustness definitions and their corresponding evaluation methodologies. Building on this analysis, we propose tower robustness, which is a novel and practical concept setting out from a global perspective. Further, we provide upper and lower bounds of tower robustness, based on hypothesis testing, for quantitative evaluation, enabling more rigorous and efficient pre-deployment assessments. Through empirical investigation, we demonstrate that our approach provides reliable robustness assessments. These findings advance the systematic understanding of robustness and contribute a practical framework for enhancing the safety of machine learning models in safety-critical applications.

Singapore University of Technology and Design (SG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
2.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.