OntoLDiff: A Highly Efficient System for Tracking Logical Difference in Large-Scale Ontologies

Modern ontologies undergo continuous evolution to accommodate new domain knowledge, correct modeling errors, and adapt to changing user requirements. Monitoring these changes is crucial for maintaining ontology quality and understanding the semantic impact of modifications on dependent systems and applications. This paper describes OntoLDiff, a highly efficient system for tracking the logical difference between two ontologies formulated in the description logic ELH. Intuitively, the logical difference between two versions of an ontology refers to the set of axioms entailed by one version but not the other, indicating the information gain or loss between them. Typically, such axioms, referred to as 'witnesses ', can be infinite, making logical difference computation infeasible. To address this challenge, OntoLDiff employs a Uniform Interpolation (UI) approach to compute a finite representation of these axioms. Instead of computing all the entailments of one ontology but not the other, which would be computationally infeasible, the UI-based approach focuses on identifying only the strongest entailments, from which all witnesses can in principle be computed from its deductive closure. Despite UI's computational complexity, OntoLDiff is currently the only tool that efficiently tracks logical differences in industrial-scale ontologies, enabling ontology curators to precisely identify meaningful changes during ontology evolution.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3746252.3761464
Primary Topic
Semantic Web and Ontologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

OntoLDiff: A Highly Efficient System for Tracking Logical Difference in Large-Scale Ontologies

Yizheng Zhao, Renate A. Schmidt
Semantic Web and Ontologies
article

OntoLDiff: A Highly Efficient System for Tracking Logical Difference in Large-Scale Ontologies

Yizheng Zhao, Renate A. Schmidt
article en

Abstract

Modern ontologies undergo continuous evolution to accommodate new domain knowledge, correct modeling errors, and adapt to changing user requirements. Monitoring these changes is crucial for maintaining ontology quality and understanding the semantic impact of modifications on dependent systems and applications. This paper describes OntoLDiff, a highly efficient system for tracking the logical difference between two ontologies formulated in the description logic ELH. Intuitively, the logical difference between two versions of an ontology refers to the set of axioms entailed by one version but not the other, indicating the information gain or loss between them. Typically, such axioms, referred to as 'witnesses ', can be infinite, making logical difference computation infeasible. To address this challenge, OntoLDiff employs a Uniform Interpolation (UI) approach to compute a finite representation of these axioms. Instead of computing all the entailments of one ontology but not the other, which would be computationally infeasible, the UI-based approach focuses on identifying only the strongest entailments, from which all witnesses can in principle be computed from its deductive closure. Despite UI's computational complexity, OntoLDiff is currently the only tool that efficiently tracks logical differences in industrial-scale ontologies, enabling ontology curators to precisely identify meaningful changes during ontology evolution.

University of Manchester (GB), Nanjing University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Government of Jiangsu Province
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Semantic Web and Ontologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.