Tracing the evolution of the brightest galaxies and diffuse light in galaxy groups

We present the second study based on a suite of 100 cosmologically motivated, controlled N -body simulations designed to advance our understanding of the role of purely gravitational dynamics in the early formation of low-mass galaxy groups (∼1–5 × 10 13 M ⊙ ). In this work, we investigate the temporal evolution of key indicators of dynamical relaxation, with a particular emphasis on the secular growth of the diffuse intragroup light (IGL), the four major group galaxies, and the mass distributions of their progenitors. We also assess the diagnostic power of several magnitude gaps between top-ranked galaxies as proxies for dynamical age. As in our previous study, we compare the outcomes from three group classes defined by the number of the brightest group galaxies (BGGs) present at the end of the simulations: single-, double-, and non-BGG systems. We find that the early assembly of galaxy groups is consistent with a stochastic Poisson process at an approximately constant merger rate. Various dynamical diagnostics, including galaxy pairwise separations, velocity dispersions, and the offset of the first-ranked galaxy from the group barycentre, indicate that single-BGG groups evolve more rapidly towards virialisation than double- and (especially) non-BGG systems. We further find that first-ranked group members and the IGL, despite their intertwined origins, follow distinct growth histories, with the IGL assembled from a more numerous and systematically lower mass population than the central object. This distinction is particularly pronounced in non-BGG systems, where about one-third of the IGL originates from small galaxies, each contributing less than 5% to this component. Among the tested magnitude gaps, the difference between the first- and fourth-ranked galaxies, Δℳ 4−1 , is proven to be a more robust indicator of dynamical age for low-mass groups than the conventional Δℳ 2−1 gap. The Δℳ 5−1 and Δℳ 6−1 gaps also perform well and might be preferable in certain contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Published
2025-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202556694
Primary Topic
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tracing the evolution of the brightest galaxies and diffuse light in galaxy groups

J. Perea, B. Bilata-Woldeyes, J. M. Solanes
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
article

Tracing the evolution of the brightest galaxies and diffuse light in galaxy groups

J. Perea, B. Bilata-Woldeyes, J. M. Solanes
article en

Abstract

We present the second study based on a suite of 100 cosmologically motivated, controlled N -body simulations designed to advance our understanding of the role of purely gravitational dynamics in the early formation of low-mass galaxy groups (∼1–5 × 10 13 M ⊙ ). In this work, we investigate the temporal evolution of key indicators of dynamical relaxation, with a particular emphasis on the secular growth of the diffuse intragroup light (IGL), the four major group galaxies, and the mass distributions of their progenitors. We also assess the diagnostic power of several magnitude gaps between top-ranked galaxies as proxies for dynamical age. As in our previous study, we compare the outcomes from three group classes defined by the number of the brightest group galaxies (BGGs) present at the end of the simulations: single-, double-, and non-BGG systems. We find that the early assembly of galaxy groups is consistent with a stochastic Poisson process at an approximately constant merger rate. Various dynamical diagnostics, including galaxy pairwise separations, velocity dispersions, and the offset of the first-ranked galaxy from the group barycentre, indicate that single-BGG groups evolve more rapidly towards virialisation than double- and (especially) non-BGG systems. We further find that first-ranked group members and the IGL, despite their intertwined origins, follow distinct growth histories, with the IGL assembled from a more numerous and systematically lower mass population than the central object. This distinction is particularly pronounced in non-BGG systems, where about one-third of the IGL originates from small galaxies, each contributing less than 5% to this component. Among the tested magnitude gaps, the difference between the first- and fourth-ranked galaxies, Δℳ 4−1 , is proven to be a more robust indicator of dynamical age for low-mass groups than the conventional Δℳ 2−1 gap. The Δℳ 5−1 and Δℳ 6−1 gaps also perform well and might be preferable in certain contexts.

Astronomy and AstrophysicsVol. 704
Institut Català de Ciències del Clima (ES), Instituto de Astrofísica de Andalucía (ES)
Universitat de Barcelona, Instituto de Astrofísica de Andalucía, European Regional Development Fund, Agencia Estatal de Investigación, Institut de Ciències del Cosmos
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.