Economic evaluation of Manchester procedure versus sacrospinous hysteropexy: A follow-up analysis of a randomized clinical trial
During two years of follow-up the Manchester procedure and sacrospinous hysteropexy showed no statistically significant different effectiveness in terms of QALYs gained against significantly higher costs for sacrospinous hysteropexy.
Authors
- Kirsten B. Kluivers (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4681-4304)
- Sascha F. M. Schulten (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0958-1422)
- Eddy Adang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4773-6176)
- Hugo W. F. van Eijndhoven (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6118-5676)
- Rosa A. Enklaar (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1547-4757)
- Mirjam Weemhoff
- Sanne A. L. van Leijsen
Institutions
- Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
- Radboud University Medical Center (NL)
- Máxima Medisch Centrum (NL)
- Zuyderland Medisch Centrum (NL)
- Isala (NL)
Publication Details
- Journal
- PLoS ONE
- Published
- 2025-11-07
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0336030
- Primary Topic
- Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- Amsterdam University Medical Centers
- ZonMw
- Radboud Universiteit
- Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
- Universiteit Maastricht
- Maastricht Universitair Medisch Centrum
- Radboud Universitair Medisch Centrum