Impact of self-administered pulse oximetry among non-hospitalized patients at risk of severe COVID-19 in Honduras: A pragmatic, cluster-randomized trial with temporal clustering
The World Health Organization recommends remote monitoring and self-administered pulse oximetry to identify silent hypoxia and the need for medical intervention in non-hospitalized high-risk COVID-19 patients. These interventions have been evaluated previously, but evidence is needed to determine the impact on morbidity and mortality, particularly in lower- and middle-income countries. A prospective, pragmatic, open-label trial was conducted in Tegucigalpa and Comayagüela, Honduras to evaluate the impact of self-administered pulse oximetry to reduce morbidity and mortality among non-hospitalized patients at high risk of adverse COVID-19 outcomes enrolled in a remote monitoring program. Participants were cluster-randomized, with temporal clustering by day, to remote monitoring plus self-administered pulse oximetry versus remote monitoring alone. Participants received daily calls to assess for high-risk clinical features, including hypoxia (SpO2 ≤ 94%) in the pulse oximetry arm. All participants reporting high risk symptoms were referred for in-person evaluation. ClinicalTrials.gov, ID number NCT04886414. Between March 30, 2022 and January 24, 2023, 1,821 participants met the intention to treat analysis criteria; 925 were randomized to remote monitoring and 897 to remote monitoring with pulse oximetry. Nearly 99% of participants reported receiving one or more COVID-19 vaccine doses, and 90.2% three or more doses, with similar coverage across arms. Pulse oximetry arm participants were more likely to be referred for clinical evaluation (OR 1.60 [95% CI 1.09 - 2.46], p = 0.018), but not more likely to be hospitalized (OR 1.55 [95% CI 0.55 - 4.37, p = 0.401]. One participant died, two required intensive care, and none required ventilation. Findings suggest that self-administered pulse oximetry increased referral for additional care but did not influence hospitalization rates among a high-risk, highly vaccinated, population with low incidence of severe COVID-19. Given infrequent progression to severe COVID-19, the relationship between the intervention and mortality, mechanical ventilation, or admission to intensive care was not assessed.
Authors
- S. Ruíz Solís
- Beatriz Romeu Álvarez
- Silvia de la Cruz (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9013-228X)
- Salomé Garnier (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3802-115X)
- Avi J. Hakim (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6754-6241)
- Hudson P. Santos (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4040-366X)
- José Jaime Correa Ochoa
- Devan Dumas (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2355-3586)
- Kathryn W. Roberts (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3558-7644)
- Alcides Martinez
- Michael de St. Aubin (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4833-6200)
- Margaret Baldwin (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3594-4330)
- Omar Diaz
- Eric James Nilles (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7044-5257)
- C. Daniel Schnorr (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2471-6383)
- Lorenzo Pavón
- R See
- A. González Ochoa (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2119-1470)
- Shiony Medice (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0003-8195-7145)
Institutions
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (UG)
- Universidad Metropolitana de Honduras (HN)
- Harvard Global Health Institute (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- PLOS Global Public Health
- Published
- 2025-11-07
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0004618
- Primary Topic
- Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00