Information, Asset Price Volatility, and Liquidity

How are asset price volatility and liquidity impacted by public perception of the economic state and by market competitivity? We wish to understand the direct impacts as well as indirect impacts via information acquisition and aggregation. To investigate, we design a laboratory experiment with human subjects as bond investors and exogenously vary the bond default rate, the private information cost schedule, and the market format. To discipline the experiment parameters and to obtain hypotheses for empirical testing, we construct a theoretical model that closely parallels the experiment. We find that the laboratory data support most theoretical predictions, for example, liquidity increases when traders purchase more precise private information, when public information indicates a less ominous state, and when the market is less competitive. Overall price volatility also increases with more precise private information and less competitivity, but it decreases with less ominous public information. Decomposing volatility into “efficient” and “inefficient” components may offer insight for policy analysis. This paper was accepted by Dorothea Kübler, behavioral economics and decision analysis. Funding: This work was supported by University of California Santa Cruz. Supplemental Material: The online appendices and data files are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2024.04911 .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Management Science
Published
2025-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2024.04911
Primary Topic
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Information, Asset Price Volatility, and Liquidity

Grace Weishi Gu, Vivian Juehui Zheng, Daniel Friedman
Management Science
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
article

Information, Asset Price Volatility, and Liquidity

Grace Weishi Gu, Vivian Juehui Zheng, Daniel Friedman
article en

Abstract

How are asset price volatility and liquidity impacted by public perception of the economic state and by market competitivity? We wish to understand the direct impacts as well as indirect impacts via information acquisition and aggregation. To investigate, we design a laboratory experiment with human subjects as bond investors and exogenously vary the bond default rate, the private information cost schedule, and the market format. To discipline the experiment parameters and to obtain hypotheses for empirical testing, we construct a theoretical model that closely parallels the experiment. We find that the laboratory data support most theoretical predictions, for example, liquidity increases when traders purchase more precise private information, when public information indicates a less ominous state, and when the market is less competitive. Overall price volatility also increases with more precise private information and less competitivity, but it decreases with less ominous public information. Decomposing volatility into “efficient” and “inefficient” components may offer insight for policy analysis. This paper was accepted by Dorothea Kübler, behavioral economics and decision analysis. Funding: This work was supported by University of California Santa Cruz. Supplemental Material: The online appendices and data files are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2024.04911 .

Management Science
University of Essex (GB), University of California, Santa Cruz (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.