Assessing spoofing impact on GNSS receivers: Carrier-to-noise density ratio ( <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" altimg="si533.svg" display="inline" id="d1e243"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>C</mml:mi> <mml:mo>/</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:m

In the context of GNSS signal processing, the carrier-to-noise density ratio ( C / N 0 ) is a powerful metric for evaluating GNSS performance, analyzing interference effects, and monitoring reception quality. Although the modeling of C / N 0 in the presence of interference has been extensively discussed in the literature, the specific impact of spoofing remains unexplored. In fact, due to the similar structure between authentic and spoofed signals, the latter directly interferes with the true signal and cannot be considered as an equivalent additional and independent noise source. This paper investigates the impact of spoofing on both true and estimated C / N 0 and proposes analytical expressions for their biases in the presence of spoofing. It reveals situations where the correlator output becomes non-ergodic, inducing divergence between the true and estimated values, as well as significant C / N 0 degradation. Additionally, there is a high dependence on the receiver architecture (estimation method) and spoofing geometry. Finally, beyond GNSS spoofing applications, this study highlights the effect of non-ergodicity on estimation and underscores the importance of studying estimation under non-ergodic conditions. • Derives complete expressions for correlator output under spoofing. • Formalizes the definition of estimated C / N 0 in GNSS receivers. • Provides analytical expressions for C / N 0 estimation bias under spoofing. • Reveals the threat posed by induced-multipath spoofing situations. • Highlights the impact of non-ergodicity on signal estimation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Signal Processing
Published
2025-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sigpro.2025.110389
Primary Topic
GNSS positioning and interference
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing spoofing impact on GNSS receivers: Carrier-to-noise density ratio ( <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" altimg="si533.svg" display="inline" id="d1e243"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>C</mml:mi> <mml:mo>/</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:m

Carl Milner, Julien Lesouple, Emile Ghizzo
Signal Processing
GNSS positioning and interference
article

Assessing spoofing impact on GNSS receivers: Carrier-to-noise density ratio ( <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" altimg="si533.svg" display="inline" id="d1e243"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>C</mml:mi> <mml:mo>/</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:m

Carl Milner, Julien Lesouple, Emile Ghizzo
article en

Abstract

In the context of GNSS signal processing, the carrier-to-noise density ratio ( C / N 0 ) is a powerful metric for evaluating GNSS performance, analyzing interference effects, and monitoring reception quality. Although the modeling of C / N 0 in the presence of interference has been extensively discussed in the literature, the specific impact of spoofing remains unexplored. In fact, due to the similar structure between authentic and spoofed signals, the latter directly interferes with the true signal and cannot be considered as an equivalent additional and independent noise source. This paper investigates the impact of spoofing on both true and estimated C / N 0 and proposes analytical expressions for their biases in the presence of spoofing. It reveals situations where the correlator output becomes non-ergodic, inducing divergence between the true and estimated values, as well as significant C / N 0 degradation. Additionally, there is a high dependence on the receiver architecture (estimation method) and spoofing geometry. Finally, beyond GNSS spoofing applications, this study highlights the effect of non-ergodicity on estimation and underscores the importance of studying estimation under non-ergodic conditions. • Derives complete expressions for correlator output under spoofing. • Formalizes the definition of estimated C / N 0 in GNSS receivers. • Provides analytical expressions for C / N 0 estimation bias under spoofing. • Reveals the threat posed by induced-multipath spoofing situations. • Highlights the impact of non-ergodicity on signal estimation.

Signal ProcessingVol. 241
École Nationale de l’Aviation Civile (FR), Université Fédérale de Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées (FR), Institut Superieur de l'Aeronautique et de l'Espace (ISAE-SUPAERO) (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
GNSS positioning and interference
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.