Creating a large designer cellulosome in yeast to boost ethanol production
Cellulosic biomass represents a promising feedstock for biofuel and biochemical production. However, its recalcitrant structure strongly hinders enzymatic degradation. Cellulosomes are large multienzyme complexes, highly efficient at degrading cellulose. A cellulase in a cellulosome has a dockerin domain that binds to a cohesin module on the CipA (cellulosome integrating protein A). In a native cellulosome all cohesins are identical, so that the cellulase types and their positions in a CipA cannot be controlled. Here, we constructed the largest designer CipA known to date. Using innovative techniques, we synthesized a designer CipA gene that encodes nine distinct cohesins and two cellulose-binding modules, which we named <i>DCipA2B9C</i>. Then, we fused nine distinct fungal cellulases separately with nine distinct dockerins for their precise positioning on DCipA2B9C to achieve enzyme proximity-effect. We constructed three yeast hosts to compare their performances. First, an enzyme host (EH) secretes nine dockerin-fused cellulases, including endoglucanases (EgIII-a, EgIII-m, and EgIII-c), exoglucanases (CBHII-j and EXG2-r), β-glucosidases (BGS-f and BGS-l), and cellulase boosters, including a LPMO-t and CDH-b. Second, the scaffoldin host (SH) expresses DCipA2B9C. Third, the cellulosome-9 host expresses DCipA2B9C and nine dockerin-fused cellulases. Native-PAGE and ELISA confirmed specific interactions between dockerins and cohesins. Additionally, native-PAGE, SDS-PAGE, and LC-MS verified the successful assembly of the multienzyme complex. Our performance evaluation showed that coculturing of EH and SH outperformed the cellulosome-9 host. It degraded microcrystalline cellulose efficiently to produce 14.29 g/L bioethanol, which surpassed all previously constructed yeast cellulosomes by fourfold or more. In summary, our study provides an effective approach to biomass degradation.
Authors
- Tzu‐Ho Chen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8248-9385)
- Jan‐Fang Cheng (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7315-7613)
- Tsui-Ling Hsu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2912-3261)
- Marimuthu Anandharaj (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7820-2038)
- Chin‐Chia Wu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1598-5127)
- Hsiao‐Ching Lin (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8229-314X)
- Wen‐Hsiung Li (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2757-5026)
- Jui-Jen Chang
- Zeba Khatoon (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6862-3509)
Institutions
- United States Department of Energy (US)
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US)
- National Chung Hsing University (TW)
- China Medical University (TW)
- Joint Genome Institute (US)
- University of Chicago (US)
- Genomics Research Center, Academia Sinica (TW)
- Institute of Biological Chemistry, Academia Sinica (TW)
- China Medical University Hospital (TW)
- Institute of Molecular Biology, Academia Sinica (TW)
- Biodiversity Research Center, Academia Sinica (TW)
- Academia Sinica (TW)
- China Medical University (CN)
- National Taipei University (TW)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2025-11-07
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2517490122
- Citations
- 3
- Primary Topic
- Biofuel production and bioconversion
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 2.02